The BrO transient formed during the pulse radiolysis of <tex-math>${\rm O}_{2}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> mixtures decayed according to second-order kinetics, and the rate constant decreased slightly as O2 pressure was increased from 400 to 1560 Torr. Besides the variation with pressure, the BrO recombination reaction exhibited an initial phase in the time regime 3-50 μsec under certain experimental conditions during which BrO disappearance occurred at a faster rate. In the pulse radiolysis of <tex-math>${\rm N}_{2}{\rm O}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> mixtures, the kinetics of BrO disappearance were found to be sensitive to the dose. In the lower dose range used in this work, the second-order rate plots were linear and BrO decay was invariant with pressure. With mixtures irradiated to a higher dose, BrO decay was also rapid but did not follow simple kinetics. The molar extinction coefficient of BrO was measured at three wavelengths in the near-uv region by determining the amount of <tex-math>${\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> that temporarily disappears during radiolysis. The molar extinction coefficient (<tex-math>$M^{-1}\times {\rm cm}^{-1}$</tex-math>) was found to be 1,620 at 338 nm, 1,500 at 333 nm, and 1,530 at 321 nm.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 April 1974
Research Article|
April 01 1974
BrO Disappearance in the Pulse Radiolysis of <tex-math>${\rm O}_{2}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> and <tex-math>${\rm N}_{2}{\rm O}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> Systems
Radiat Res (1974) 58 (1): 25–37.
Citation
R. W. Cahill, J. F. Riley; BrO Disappearance in the Pulse Radiolysis of <tex-math>${\rm O}_{2}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> and <tex-math>${\rm N}_{2}{\rm O}+{\rm Br}_{2}$</tex-math> Systems. Radiat Res 1 April 1974; 58 (1): 25–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3573946
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner