The additional dose <tex-math>$D_{r}$</tex-math> necessary to reach a given biological effect, when a fraction D_{s} is split into two equal "subfractions" <tex-math>$2D_{i}$</tex-math> separated by an interval of time i, has been studied as a function of the dose per fraction D_{s}. LD_{50} of mice, scored 20-30 days after irradiation on the abdomen, has been chosen as biological endpoint ("intestinal death"). When smaller doses per fraction, D_{s} and <tex-math>$2D_{i}$</tex-math> were studied, they had to be delivered N times (<tex-math>$N\times D_{s}$</tex-math> or <tex-math>$N\times 2D_{i}$</tex-math>), the number of fractions N being adapted to their size in order to reach a suitable rate of survival. The overall treatment time for each compared protocol was kept constant. Intervals i between the two subfractions <tex-math>$2D_{i}$</tex-math> of 3.5 and 24 hr were studied. No significant difference appeared in the variation of <tex-math>$D_{r}$</tex-math> as a function of D_{s} related to interval i for the two considered intervals. For i = 3.5 hr, additional dose <tex-math>$D_{r}=2D_{i}-D_{s}$</tex-math> may be ascribed mainly to a difference in cellular repair (Elkind repair) between the compared radiation regimes or, in other words, <tex-math>$D_{r}$</tex-math> may be considered as the "differential recovered dose" related to cellular repair when a fraction D_{s} is split into two equal subfractions <tex-math>$2D_{i}$</tex-math> separated by an interval i. <tex-math>$D_{r}$</tex-math> was found to be very small for the doses per fraction currently used in radiotherapy (<tex-math>$D_{s}\leq 300\ {\rm rad}$</tex-math>). It increases rather rapidly when D_{s} exceeds 400 rad and reaches about 300 rad for <tex-math>$D_{s}\cong 1000\ {\rm rad}$</tex-math>. On the other hand, variation of <tex-math>$D_{r}$</tex-math> as a function of D_{s} was not very different for "intestinal death" and the other "gross" criteria we have investigated: skin reactions on mice, skin reactions on patients, tumor regression on patients. A differential effect related to fraction number is then unlikely between these tissues in the usual conditions of radiotherapy. Finally, in a fractionated radiation treatment, the total dose corresponding to a given effect does not depend very much on the number of fractions, provided that the overall time is kept constant and that the doses per fraction do not exceed 300 rad.

Skip Nav Destination

Close

Article navigation

1 June 1974

Research Article|
June 01 1974

# Early Recovery for Intestinal Stem Cells, as a Function of Dose per Fraction, Evaluated by Survival Rate after Fractionated Irradiation of the Abdomen of Mice

*Radiat Res*(1974) 58 (3): 498–515.

Citation

A. Wambersie, J. Dutreix, J. Gueulette, J. Lellouch; Early Recovery for Intestinal Stem Cells, as a Function of Dose per Fraction, Evaluated by Survival Rate after Fractionated Irradiation of the Abdomen of Mice. * Radiat Res* 1 June 1974; 58 (3): 498–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3573919

Download citation file:

Close

## Sign in

Don't already have an account? Register

### Client Account

You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.

### Sign in via your Institution

Sign in via your Institution### Citing articles via

Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury

Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo

Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?

Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held

Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light

Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner