The response of a transplantable mammary carcinoma in CBA mice to single doses and two or five fractions of X rays, with and without the hypoxic cell sensitizer Ro-07-0582, has been tested using delay of tumor regrowth as the measure of response. In the tumors treated with X rays alone the processes of repair of sublethal injury, and reoxygenation between fractions, appeared to counteract each other so that no extra dose was needed to achieve a particular level of damage when fractionated irradiation was used. When Ro-07-0582 was administered shortly before each radiation dose, however, the tumor cells were made more uniformly radiosensitive, so that without the complication of hypoxia and reoxygenation their repair capacity could be measured. The repair capacity measured in this tumor was approximately 50-70% of that observed in skin. The response of the tumor to different treatments has been expressed in relation to the response of mouse skin, as an example of normal tissue. With X rays alone, more tumor delay could be achieved for a standard level of skin reaction if the dose were fractionated, due presumably to the difference in repair capacities and reoxygenation in the tumor. The tumor delay for a constant skin reaction was further increased when Ro-07-0582 was present at 0.67 mg/g body weight. "X-ray dose enhancement ratios" of 1.7 for single doses, 1.6 for two fractions, and 1.2 for five fractions, were measured at a particular level of tumor response.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 April 1976
Research Article|
April 01 1976
The Response of a Transplantable Tumor to Fractionated Irradiation: 1. X Rays and the Hypoxic Cell Radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582
Radiat Res (1976) 66 (1): 66–75.
Citation
J. Denekamp, S. R. Harris; The Response of a Transplantable Tumor to Fractionated Irradiation: 1. X Rays and the Hypoxic Cell Radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582. Radiat Res 1 April 1976; 66 (1): 66–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574356
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr