Neuroblasts of Chortophaga viridifasciata (DeGeer) in culture were exposed to different doses of 225, 265, or 280 nm ultraviolet radiations at 11 different stages and substages of the mitotic cycle and individually selected cells were timed to breakdown of the nuclear membrane. Comparisons of the effectiveness of different wavelengths on the different stages were based on the dose that reduced the cell progression rate to 67% of normal (<tex-math>${\rm D}_{67}$</tex-math>) and the slope of the regression line, i.e., the control to treated time (C/T) ratio <tex-math>$\text{change}/{\rm erg}/{\rm mm}^{2}$</tex-math> at the <tex-math>${\rm D}_{67}$</tex-math> level. Cells of the prereplication period (metaphase + anaphase + early telophase) and the S phase (middle and late telophase + interphase + very early prophase) are equally sensitive to uv and contrast sharply with the much lower sensitivity of those in the postreplication period (early and middle prophase). This can best be interpreted if chromosomal DNA is the chromophore for uv-induced mitotic retardation. Cells in the prereplication period at exposure show no wavelength effect. In the S phase all stages except middle telophase and all stages combined are significantly more sensitive to 265 and 280 nm than to 225 nm. Of the postreplication stages, early prophase is retarded significantly more by 280 than by 225 or 265 nm. The C/T <tex-math>$\text{ratio}/{\rm erg}/{\rm mm}^{2}$</tex-math> is greater after exposure to 265 nm at all prereplication and replication stages, but exhibits no consistent wavelength pattern during the postreplication period. Evidence based on the orientation of the neuroblast with respect to the uv source suggests that the chromophore for mitotic retardation does not reside within the centrosome and related structures, but may be present, at least partly, in the nucleolus.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 October 1976
Research Article|
October 01 1976
Mitotic Effects of Monochromatic Ultraviolet Radiation at 225, 265, and 280 nm on Eleven Stages of the Cell Cycle of the Grasshopper Neuroblast in Culture: 1. Overall Retardation from the Stage Irradiated to Nuclear Membrane Breakdown
Radiat Res (1976) 68 (1): 57–74.
Citation
J. Gordon Carlson; Mitotic Effects of Monochromatic Ultraviolet Radiation at 225, 265, and 280 nm on Eleven Stages of the Cell Cycle of the Grasshopper Neuroblast in Culture: 1. Overall Retardation from the Stage Irradiated to Nuclear Membrane Breakdown. Radiat Res 1 October 1976; 68 (1): 57–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574534
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner