The influence of a chronic environmental stress on the incidence of radiation-induced tumors, lens opacities, and survival times was determined. Female CFN rats were exposed to whole-body irradiation with either 300 rad of fission neutrons, 600 rad of 250 kV X rays, or sham irradiation. Within each irradiated group, rats were assigned to one of four environments: exposure to 25°C until irradiated and immediately returned to (1) a 25°C or (2) a 2°C environment for duration of life; acclimation to a 2°C environment for 40 days, irradiated, then returned to (3) a 2°C or (4) a 25°C environment. Postirradiation exposure to the 2°C compared to the 25°C environment reduced tumor incidence in the X- and neutron-irradiated groups, but reduced incidence of lens opacities only in the neutron-irradiated group. A 2°C environment before and after irradiation produced similar results. Return of the 2°C acclimated rats to a 25°C environment increased incidence of tumors and lens opacities in the X-ray group, but reduced incidence of both in the neutron-irradiated rats. Chronic exposure to 2°C reduced the tumor incidence of nonirradiated rats but did not change the incidence of lens opacities. Median life expectancy was reduced by exposure to the 2°C environment. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that a chronic environmental stress initiated immediately after a carcinogen, in this study X or neutron radiation, may inhibit the malignant transformation. In view of other published data the stress-induced increase in metabolic rate may be an important factor in the inhibition.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| December 01 1976
The Influence of a Chronic Environmental Stress on Radiation Carcinogenesis
Radiat Res (1976) 68 (3): 449–458.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Donald G. Baker, Alexandra Jahn; The Influence of a Chronic Environmental Stress on Radiation Carcinogenesis. Radiat Res 1 December 1976; 68 (3): 449–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574326
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Monte Carlo Simulation of SARS-CoV-2 Radiation-Induced Inactivation for Vaccine Development
Ziad Francis, Sebastien Incerti, Sara A. Zein, Nathanael Lampe, Carlos A. Guzman, Marco Durante
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
RITCARD: Radiation-Induced Tracks, Chromosome Aberrations, Repair and Damage
Ianik Plante, Artem Ponomarev, Zarana Patel, Tony Slaba, Megumi Hada