The response of a transplantable mammary carcinoma in CBA mice has been assessed using delay in tumor growth after irradiation. Dose-response curves have been obtained for tumors treated with single doses or with two or five fractions of cyclotron neutrons, given in the presence or absence of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582. The results are compared with previously published X-ray data. A greater delay in tumor growth was observed for all treatments if the radiosensitizing drug was present. A radiation dose reduction factor (DRF) could be measured from the pairs of dose-response curves. The factor was 1.2 to 1.4 for single doses and 1.1 to 1.3 for two and five fractions when 0.67 mg/g of the drug was used before each irradiation. The effect of a smaller drug dose (0.15 mg/g) was tested with a single dose of neutrons and a smaller effect was observed (DRF = 1.1). These results, together with those of papers I and II, show that all three methods of overcoming the resistance of hypoxic cells (fractionation, radiosensitizers, fast neutrons) are effective, but less than optimal if used individually. Any combination of the three increases the therapeutic effectiveness. The most effective treatment tested, with this tumor, was five fractions of neutrons plus the radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582.
Skip Nav Destination
Close
Article navigation
1 May 1977
Research Article|
May 01 1977
The Response of a Transplantable Tumor to Fractionated Irradiation: III. Fast Neutrons Plus the Radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582
Radiat Res (1977) 70 (2): 425–432.
Citation
J. Denekamp, C. Morris, S. B. Field; The Response of a Transplantable Tumor to Fractionated Irradiation: III. Fast Neutrons Plus the Radiosensitizer Ro-07-0582. Radiat Res 1 May 1977; 70 (2): 425–432. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574599
Download citation file:
Close
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?
Pataje G. Prasanna, Gayle E. Woloschak, Andrea L. DiCarlo, Jeffrey C. Buchsbaum, Dörthe Schaue, Arnab Chakravarti, Francis A. Cucinotta, Silvia C. Formenti, Chandan Guha, Dale J. Hu, Mohammad K. Khan, David G. Kirsch, Sunil Krishnan, Wolfgang W. Leitner, Brian Marples, William McBride, Minesh P. Mehta, Shahin Rafii, Elad Sharon, Julie M. Sullivan, Ralph R. Weichselbaum, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Bhadrasain Vikram, C. Norman Coleman, Kathryn D. Held
Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light
Manuela Buonanno, Brian Ponnaiya, David Welch, Milda Stanislauskas, Gerhard Randers-Pehrson, Lubomir Smilenov, Franklin D. Lowy, David M. Owens, David J. Brenner
Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group
Hualin Zhang, Xiaodong Wu, Xin Zhang, Sha X. Chang, Ali Megooni, Eric D. Donnelly, Mansoor M. Ahmed, Robert J. Griffin, James S. Welsh, Charles B. Simone, II, Nina A. Mayr