One important goal of radiobiology is to describe the response to radiation damage in quantitative terms. Because the dose response is nonlinear, this typically involves the comparison of several dose-dependent parameters. Past attempts at simplifying this process have often involved manipulations of these dose-dependent parameters to derive a single comparative number. Unfortunately, the advantages of a single comparative number, often a ratio or even a ratio of ratios, can be outweighed by the loss of significant biological information. Examples are given in four areas of research: (1) definition of radiation response at clinically relevant radiation doses, (2) modification of radiation sensitivity by oxygen, (3) effects of combined radiation modifiers (e.g., sensitizers and protectors), and (4) comparisons of radiation modifiers in different dose/response regions. In each area, to define and compare dose response, we propose the use of consistent, simple, and absolute radiation response parameters: the inverse dose (or dose) required to produce a given effect. The use of absolute sensitivity (or resistance) avoids the use of many other parameters, ratios, and definitions and permits a uniform and unambiguous description of "radiation response."
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1992
Research Article|
October 01 1992
Comparisons of Cellular Radiation Response Using Absolute Rather Than Relative Parameters
Radiat Res (1992) 132 (1): 40–49.
Citation
C. J. Koch, K. A. Skov; Comparisons of Cellular Radiation Response Using Absolute Rather Than Relative Parameters. Radiat Res 1 October 1992; 132 (1): 40–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3578331
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Commonalities Between COVID-19 and Radiation Injury
Carmen I. Rios, David R. Cassatt, Brynn A. Hollingsworth, Merriline M. Satyamitra, Yeabsera S. Tadesse, Lanyn P. Taliaferro, Thomas A. Winters, Andrea L. DiCarlo
Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases
Kotaro Ozasa, Yukiko Shimizu, Akihiko Suyama, Fumiyoshi Kasagi, Midori Soda, Eric J. Grant, Ritsu Sakata, Hiromi Sugiyama, Kazunori Kodama
Effects of Radiation on Blood Pressure and Body Weight in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Model. Are Radiation Effects on Blood Pressure Affected by Genetic Background?
Norio Takahashi, Munechika Misumi, Yasuharu Niwa, Hideko Murakami, Waka Ohishi, Toshiya Inaba, Akiko Nagamachi, Satoshi Tanaka, Ignacia Braga Tanaka, III, Gen Suzuki
Long-Term Effects of the Rain Exposure Shortly after the Atomic Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Ritsu Sakata, Eric J. Grant, Kyoji Furukawa, Munechika Misumi, Harry Cullings, Kotaro Ozasa, Roy E. Shore
Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and Risk of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tanvi Srivastava, Ekaterina Chirikova, Sapriya Birk, Fanxiu Xiong, Tarek Benzouak, Jane Y. Liu, Paul J. Villeneuve, Lydia B. Zablotska