Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
J. J. Rafter
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal:
Radiation Research
Radiation Research (1976) 66 (1): 100–105.
Published: 01 April 1976
Abstract
On the basis of earlier tissue distribution data, obtained in mice and rats, we proposed that the tissue distribution of intravenously injected S-2-[3-aminopropylamino]-ethyl-phosphorothioic acid (WR-2721) was more closely correlated with the injected dose per unit surface area than it was with the injected dose per unit body weight. To test this proposal, we have compared the tissue distribution of 35 S-labeled WR-2721 at 15 and 30 min after intravenous injection in mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs. The results of this study demonstrate that the tissue distribution is not a strict function of either the body weight or the surface area, but rather falls intermediate to the predictions of these parameters. By extrapolation, this observation would predict that a dose of 20 mg of WR-2721 per kilogram of body weight would provide humans with the same amount of protection that 100 mg/kg provides the mouse, i.e., a 50-80% increase in radiation resistance.