Abbreviations and Acronyms
Following advances in prevention and management, clinical outcomes for patients with ischemic heart disease—in particular, myocardial infarction—have substantially improved. There remains, however, an unmet need for novel therapies to better manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction beyond that afforded by current lifestyle modification and pharmacologic management. Cell-based therapies offer a promise to address this need.
Although limited in numbers and duration of follow-up, meta-analyses by the Cochrane Group1 and others support the suggestion that, unlike trials on acute myocardial infarction, there is a signal of benefit after cell-based therapy for patients with more chronic ischemic heart disease who have HFrEF. These analyses suggest that autologous bone marrow cell-based treatment may reduce early mortality and rehospitalizations as a result of HF. These studies also showed evidence to support clinical health benefits, including improved left ventricular end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction, along with positive changes in New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity.
The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02438306) is designed to test whether intramyocardial delivery of high-dose autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM MNCs) in patients selected for the characteristics of their cells can improve clinical outcomes in ischemic HFrEF.7 The trial is actively enrolling up to 260 patients in up to 40 centers in the United States and Canada, with a 10-patient, open-label, “roll-in” cohort. Trial design and outcomes are summarized in Figure 1.
Results to Date
The roll-in, open-label cohort has been completed at 3 US centers. All 10 patients received the autologous BM MNCs successfully, and no serious adverse events were observed related to any of the procedures performed.8 Despite symptomatic ischemic HFrEF, 2-year survival was 100%, and all patients completed 24 months of follow-up. Changes in guideline-directed improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion scores over the follow-up period (Fig. 2) were consistent with improvements in functional capacity, as measured by an increased median change in 6-minute walk distance of 37.5 meters at 12 months and an increase of 31 meters at 24 months, and in quality of life, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, in 7 of 10 patients at 12 months and 6 of 10 patients at 24 months.9
The randomized, double-blind cohort study continues to enroll patients with ischemic HFrEF at centers in the United States and Canada. To date, 110 patients have been enrolled and randomly assigned, with 10 of those patients randomly assigned to the control group having crossed over to receive the active cell treatment after 2 years of follow-up, as prespecified in the study protocol.
With the high CD34-positive effective dosage provided by the selected autologous BM MNCs, completion of the current trial is occurring in parallel with a different clinical trial program designed to evaluate the same autologous, personalized cell product for patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03455725). To date, 3 patients have been enrolled in this study.
As a complementary adjunct to the ongoing phase 3 trial with autologous BM MNCs for patients with ischemic HFrEF, a trial to evaluate an allogeneic natural killer-1R–positive mesenchymal stem cell product for the same indication is beginning in 2023. This trial is intended to target patients who lack the optimal cells for personalized treatment using autologous BM MNCs.
On July 24, 2023, the sponsor announced a pause in enrollment based on an interim analysis and recommendations made by the independent data and safety monitoring board. Although there were no treatment-emergent safety concerns, the analysis indicated that the trial was unlikely to meet its primary 12-month, 3-tier hierarchical efficacy end point. Notably, available 24-month follow-up data suggest a 37% relative risk reduction in cardiac death equivalents and an 18% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The sponsor, the principal investigators, and the executive steering committee are exploring a protocol redesign to better test whether this therapeutic approach is effective.
Open Access: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by The Texas Heart Institute®. This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and the use is noncommercial.
Author Contributions: C.J.P. conceived this talk and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. C.J.P. and A.N.R. reviewed, edited, and approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None.
Funding/Support: C.J.P. receives research grants from and is a consultant to BioCardia, Inc. A.N.R. receives research grants from and is a consultant to BioCardia, Inc.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Received a final version of this manuscript.
Section Editor: Emerson Perin, MD, PhD.
Meeting Presentation: Presented at the 3rd Annual International Symposium on Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine; May 12-13, 2023; Houston, TX.
Acknowledgment: This trial is currently paused (not for safety issues) and undergoing protocol revisions.