We report first record of the occurrence of the aquatic empidid genus Trichoclinocera Collin in Missouri based upon aquatic macroinvertebrate samples collected during March 2016 from two riffles in East Fork of the Black River in Reynolds County in the Ozark Highlands. Substrate characteristics and notes on habitat from where larval specimens of Trichoclinocera were collected are also provided.

The Empididae (dance flies) genus Trichoclinocera Collin is represented by 40 recognized species worldwide of which 16 occur in the Nearctic Region with six species – T. agilis Sinclair, T. cummingi Sinclair, T. fumosa (Vaillant), T. hamifera (Melander), T. minor (Melander), and T. ozarkensis Sinclair reported to occur in some states bordering Missouri (Sinclair 1994; Saigusa and Sinclair 2016). However, there is no published documentation of Trichoclinocera occurring in Missouri. We identified larval specimens of Trichoclinocera in macroinvertebrate community samples collected from plastic mesh bags placed in riffles in East Fork of the Black River (EFBR) downstream from Lower Taum Sauk Reservoir. EFBR is a 4th order stream in Reynolds County in the Ozark Highlands Ecological Section of Missouri (Cleland et al. 1997; Nigh and Schroeder 2002) (Fig. 1). The plastic mesh bags were placed in riffles downstream from the Lower Taum Sauk Reservoir Dam as part of a larger project to assess potential change in macroinvertebrate communities if small substrates were augmented in the channel downstream from the dam. The mesh bags were 460 mm long by 230 mm wide, and of two different mesh sizes (small 9.5 mm mesh and large 12.7 mm mesh). We sieved dry substrate from a gravel bar upstream of the reservoir into 4–8 mm, 8–16 mm, 16–32 mm, and 32–45.3 mm size groups and placed equal proportions of all four substrate size groups in the small mesh bags. Large mesh bags received equal proportions of only the three larger substrate size groups. Five gravel-filled bags of each mesh size were placed in five riffles located 0.08, 0.7, 1.3, 2.2, and 3.8 km downstream from the reservoir dam. The gravel-filled mesh bags were deployed within the five riffles in EFBR for 34 days prior to retrieval on 22 March 2016 to allow time for macroinvertebrate community colonization.

Figure 1

Location of riffles in East Fork of the Black River in Missouri where larval Trichoclinocera were collected from gravel-filled mesh bags during 22 March 2016.

Figure 1

Location of riffles in East Fork of the Black River in Missouri where larval Trichoclinocera were collected from gravel-filled mesh bags during 22 March 2016.

Close modal

Contents of each gravel-filled mesh bag was preserved in 10% formalin solution upon collection, transported to the laboratory, rinsed with tap water, and subsampled and processed according to methods outlined by MDNR (2012). Macroinvertebrate specimens sorted from each subsample were transferred to 80% ethanol and viewed with use of a dissection microscope at magnifications up to 80x to determine taxonomic identities of specimens collected. Taxonomic keys and descriptive information provided in Sinclair (1994) and Courtney and Merritt (2008) were used to identify the larval specimens of Trichoclinocera we collected. Diagnostic characteristics used in identification of Trichoclinocera larvae include the absence of posterior spiracles on the body, absence of lateral setae on the abdomen, absence of a brushy protuberance on the last thoracic segment, the number and degree of development of prolegs (creeping welts), and presence of a pair of dorsolateral lobes and median lobe of the terminal abdominal segment (Sinclair 1994; Sinclair and Harkrider 2004; Courtney and Merritt 2008). Mature larvae of Trichoclinocera can be distinguished from those of morphologically similar Empididae (i.e., Clinocera Meigen) by the distinctly forked apex of the median lobe of the terminal abdominal segment (Sinclair 1994).

The two larval specimens of Trichoclinocera we found in material collected from EFBR are not identified beyond genus because descriptions of species within the genus are based upon adult characteristics and the species currently cannot be distinguished based on larvae or pupae. However, the species is possibly T. ozarkensis based on proximity of EFBR to Arkansas and Illinois locality records for adults of T. ozarkensis provided by Sinclair (1994). The larval specimens of Trichoclinocera are retained in collections at the Missouri Department of Conservation, Central Region Office and Conservation Research Center, Columbia, Missouri, and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

The Trichoclinocera larvae we found were only in two small mesh bags in two riffles at 2.2 and 3.8 km downstream from the dam. Watershed area of reaches with riffles where we collected larval Trichoclinocera are 230.3 km2 and 238.3 km2. Average discharge of EFBR was 1.4 m3/s (1.2–1.6 m3/s), water temperature 10.0 °C (9.6–10.5 °C), dissolved oxygen concentration 9.5 ppm (8.4–10.3 ppm), conductivity 110 μS/cm2 (104–115 μS/cm2), pH 7.4 (pH 7.2–7.6), and turbidity 3.9 NTU (3.5–5.9 NTU) during 22 March 2016 (summarized from data provided courtesy of U. S. Geological Survey 2017, stream gage 07061290, accessed 25 July 2017 from USGS on-line database, https://waterdata.usgs.gov/mo/nwis).

After processing macroinvertebrates from each gravel-filled mesh bag, we sieved contents from each bag into 10 substrate size categories. On average the bags where larval Trichoclinocera were found contained 20.3% of substrate particles 31.5 mm or larger, 17.2% 22.4–31.5 mm, 14.3% 16.0–22.4 mm, 14.2% 11.2–16.0 mm, 12.0% 8.0–11.2 mm, 12.1% 5.6–8.0 mm, 7.1% 4.0–5.6 mm, 2.1% 2.8–4.0 mm, 0.2% 2.0–2.8 mm, and 0.5% 0.1–2.0 mm. Larvae of some dance fly genera are associated with both lotic erosional and depositional and lentic littoral habitats (Courtney and Merritt 2008), but the genus Trichoclinocera is restricted to lotic habitats with rocky substrates (Sinclair 1994). Although the sieved substrate in bags we deployed in riffles in EFBR would not be the same as native substrate of the riffles, this agrees with our collection of larval Trichoclinocera from gravel-filled mesh bags.

The Empididae in general are considered facultative regarding tolerance to environmental stress and can be found in pristine to moderately disturbed environments, but are found in abundance most often in moderately disturbed environments (Voshell 2002). It is interesting we found larval Trichoclinocera only in bags deployed in riffles furthest downstream from the dam. Riffles closer to the dam were noted impaired by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources and listed on the 303(d) List of Impaired Waters in 2016 (MDNR 2016). Perhaps riffles greater than 1.3 km downstream of the dam have recovered to a moderately disturbed state.

This report represents first documentation of occurrence of Trichoclinocera in Missouri and adds to knowledge of the diversity of empidid fauna inhabiting streams in the state. This report also contributes to knowledge of the habitat of Trichoclinocera in North America. Additional macroinvertebrate sampling in streams combined with rearing and association of Trichoclinocera larvae and pupae to adults through collections and molecular techniques will add to knowledge of the taxonomy, distribution, habitat, and autecology of Trichoclinocera species.

Christopher Fisher and John Brant assisted with deployment of gravel-filled mesh bags, and collection and processing of samples. Paul Cieslewicz, Del Lobb, and James Baker also assisted with deployment of gravel-filled mesh bags and collection of samples. Brandy Bergthold and Adriane Podgursky also assisted with processing samples. Alicia Struckhoff prepared the map for the manuscript.

Cleland
,
D. T.
,
P. E.
Avers
,
W. H.
McNabb
,
M. E.
Jensen
,
R. G.
Bailey
,
T.
King
, and
W. E.
Russell
.
1997
.
Chapter 9: The national hierarchical framework of ecological units
.
In
:
Ecosystem Management Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources
. (
Boyce
,
M. S.
, and
A. W.
Haney
,
eds.)
.
Yale University Press
,
New Haven
,
pp
.
181
200
.
Courtney
,
G. W.
, and
R. W.
Merritt
.
2008
.
Chapter 22: Aquatic Diptera. Part one. Larvae of aquatic diptera
.
In
:
An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 4th edition
, (
Merritt
,
R. W.
,
K. W.
Cummings
, &
M. B.
Berg
,
eds.)
.
Kendall/Hunt Publishing
,
Dubuque
,
pp
.
847
989
.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)
.
2012
.
Semi-quantitative macroinvertebrate stream bioassessment
.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
,
Jefferson City, MO
.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)
.
2016
.
Missouri integrated water quality report and section 303(d) list, 2016
.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
,
Jefferson City, MO
.
Nigh
,
T. A.
, and
W. A.
Schroeder
.
2002
.
Atlas of Missouri ecoregions
.
Missouri Department of Conservation
,
Jefferson City, MO
.
Saigusa
,
T.
, and
B. J.
Sinclair
.
2016
.
Revision of the Japanese species of Trichoclinocera Collin (Diptera: Empididae: Clinocerinae)
.
Zootaxa
4103
:
201
229
.
Sinclair
,
B. J.
1994
.
Revision of the Nearctic species of Trichoclinocera Collin (Diptera: Empididae; Clinocerinae)
.
The Canadian Entomologist
126
:
1007
1059
.
Sinclair
,
B. J.
, and
J. R.
Harkrider
.
2004
.
The immature stages and rearing observations of the aquatic dance fly, Roederiodes wirthi Coquillett (Diptera: Empididae: Clinocerinae), with taxonomic notes on the genus
.
Studia Dipterologica
11
(
1
):
51
61
.
Voshell
,
J. R.
, Jr
.
2002
.
A Guide to Common Freshwater Invertebrates of North America
.
The McDonald & Woodward Publishing
,
Blacksburg, VA
.,
442
pp
.