Background: Although a number of experimental therapies for spinal cord injury (SCI) have recently emerged, few authors have examined the goals of individuals with SCI considering experimental therapies, and none have determined whether sociodemographic and injury-specific characteristics influence that engagement. Objectives: To determine (a) the goals of individuals with SCI who are considering experimental therapies; (b) whether sociodemographic factors, injury-specific characteristics, and concerns over adverse events influence those goals and/or participation in experimental therapies and clinical trials; and (c) whether people with SCI feel they have adequate information about experimental therapies and clinical trials. Methods: An online survey that yielded 364 responses. Results: Most respondents (83.7%) had sought information about experimental therapies, and just under half (47.8%) had received one. The most frequently cited functional goals were improvement in bowel and bladder function and elimination of dysreflexia (60.4%). Several goals were influenced by age and level and completeness of injury, and most respondents (93.4%) wanted more information about experimental therapies. Just over one-third (34.6%) of respondents had participated in a clinical trial, and nearly all (96.9%) wanted more information about them. Having received experimental therapies and participated in clinical trials was positively correlated with seeking SCI-specific care from an SCI specialist rather than from a primary care physician. Most (83.9%) respondents would avoid or be reluctant to engage with a medical center if they were made aware of harm done to trial participants. Conclusion: This work suggests that there are unmet information needs among people with SCI, specifically pertaining to experimental therapies and clinical trials. It also reveals that improved access to SCI specialists may enhance access to novel treatments and research efforts. Being made aware of harm to trial participants may influence the decision of individuals with SCI to seek care at or enroll in trials at these clinical sites.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Fall 2021
Research Article|
November 17 2021
An Assessment of Which Sociodemographic and Spinal Cord Injury–Specific Characteristics Influence Engagement With Experimental Therapies and Participation in Clinical Trials
Carlotta Pazzi;
Carlotta Pazzi
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Clara Farrehi;
Clara Farrehi
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Maclain Capron;
Maclain Capron
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Kim Anderson, PhD;
Kim Anderson, PhD
2MetroHealth Medical Center of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Stillman
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Corresponding author: Michael Stillman, MD, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 601, Philadelphia, PA 19107; phone: 215-955-3523; email: Michael. [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2021) 27 (4): 28–39.
Citation
Carlotta Pazzi, Clara Farrehi, Maclain Capron, Kim Anderson, Bonnie Richardson, Michael Stillman; An Assessment of Which Sociodemographic and Spinal Cord Injury–Specific Characteristics Influence Engagement With Experimental Therapies and Participation in Clinical Trials. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 December 2021; 27 (4): 28–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.46292/sci20-00070
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionCiting articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team