Health care providers are not generally trained in moral philosophy, and yet they often have to make serious and difficult ethical decisions about patient care. In some cases, the health care provider may have assistance from a bioethicist but may feel the advice is not quite right and yet not know how to clearly and forcefully articulate a better position or pinpoint what seems wrong. In other cases, the provider may have a feeling of frustration that he or she is not doing enough for a patient but is not sure what more can be done, such as when a patient is being released from medical care into an environment that is inadequate to his or her needs, or when a patient is being informed about a procedure to obtain consent but may not really understand the possible ramifications of the risks involved, or when a patient is being involved as an equal partner in decisions about the treatment options but may be making a mistaken decision. This issue of Topics in Spinal Cord Rehabilitation addresses some specific ethical dilemmas and provides a general understanding of ethics or moral philosophy that exceeds what is learned from parents, school, or religion, which normally involves basic decency and courtesy to others or being obedient to (often oversimplified or unjustified) rules. In some cases, health care providers must help establish policies, not just follow them; obedience, even when it is a virtue, is not a guide for deciding which policies are best.
Introduction to Perspectives on Ethical Issues and Dilemmas in the Treatment of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Richard Garlikov, Amie Jackson; Introduction to Perspectives on Ethical Issues and Dilemmas in the Treatment of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 January 2008; 13 (3): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1303-1
Download citation file: