Some of the most difficult issues in spinal cord injury (SCI) medicine occur when existential questions arise, for example, when is life with SCI not worth living? As a static, nonprogressive disability, high levels of SCI are usually compatible with a long lifespan—even when a ventilator is required to sustain life. As a form of life-sustaining treatment, a ventilator—like any other medical treatment—can be freely chosen or rejected by a competent patient. But what are the minimum standards for competency (or decision-making capacity), and how much does a new patient need to know about life with SCI to make a fully informed decision? For a patient who has lived with SCI for a while and now despairs due to a lack of options or social supports, is a decision to be removed from a ventilator an act of authentic autonomy or a forced choice due to social injustices? This article explores these issues in some depth and offers SCI health care professionals some suggestions for helping patients navigate these difficult and lonely waters.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
January 09 2008
Calling It Quits: When Patients or Proxies Request to Withdraw or Withhold Life-Sustaining Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury
Kristi Kirschner
Kristi Kirschner
1
Coleman Foundation Chair in Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2008) 13 (3): 30–44.
Citation
Kristi Kirschner; Calling It Quits: When Patients or Proxies Request to Withdraw or Withhold Life-Sustaining Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 January 2008; 13 (3): 30–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1303-30
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team