Although various quality of life studies, surveys, and instruments shed light on what enhances or diminishes quality of life, or our perceptions and experience of it, they confuse defining the concept of quality of life, understanding a general principle for it, and being able to individualize the criteria for different people. More important, quality of life is not the precise concept that is important and relevant in the issues that are of medical importance; there is a better, more precise concept to use— the concept of whether a treatment or life with particular circumstances is worthwhile. Quality of life is not commonly important in the practice of medicine outside of psychiatry; it is considered to be important, outside of psychiatry, mostly or only in regard to end-of-life care, radical treatment procedures, and rehabilitative medicine in the case of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, particularly when the latter two cause especially serious and devastating disability. In those cases, consideration of quality of life, as it is described in the literature, is a mistake for a number of reasons.

White CL, Lauzon S, Yaffe MJ, Wood-Dauphinee S. Toward a model of quality of life for family caregivers of stroke survivors. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(3):625–638.
,
Toward a model of quality of life for family caregivers of stroke survivors
,
Qual Life Res.
, vol.
13
(pg.
625
-
638
)
Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehab Res Dev. 2005;42(3):87–110.
,
Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings
,
J Rehab Res Dev.
, vol.
42
(pg.
87
-
110
)
Kothari, S. Clinical (mis)judgments of quality of life after disability. J Clin Ethics. 2004;Winter:300–307.
,
Clinical (mis)judgments of quality of life after disability
,
J Clin Ethics
(pg.
300
-
307
)
Jang Y, Hiseh C-L, Wang Y-H, Wu Y-H. A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1890–1895.
,
A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury
,
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol.
85
(pg.
1890
-
1895
)
Hammell WH. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:491–502.
,
Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique
,
Spinal Cord
, vol.
42
(pg.
491
-
502
)
Gerhart KA, Corbet B. Uninformed consent; biased decisionmaking following spinal cord injury. HEC Forum. 1995;7(2-3):110–121.
,
Uninformed consent; biased decisionmaking following spinal cord injury
,
HEC Forum
, vol.
7
(pg.
110
-
121
)
World Health Organization. Position paper. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1403–1409. Cited by: Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3):87–110.
Guttmann L. Spinal Cord Injuries: Comprehensive Management and Research. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1973, p.1. Cited by: Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3):87–110.
Gerhart KA, Koziol-McLain J, Lowenstein SR, Whiteneck GG. Quality of life following spinal cord injury: knowledge and attitudes of emergency care providers. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(4):807–812. Cited by: Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: a review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3):87–110.
Hammell WH. Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:491–502. Citing Duggan CH, Dijkers M. Quality of life—peaks and valleys: a qualitative analysis of the narratives of person with spinal cord injuries. Can J Rehabil. 1999;12:181–191. Duggan CH, Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Rehab Psychol. 2001;46:3–27.
Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:95–105.
,
Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples
,
Spinal Cord
, vol.
44
(pg.
95
-
105
)
This content is only available as a PDF.