Although various quality of life studies, surveys, and instruments shed light on what enhances or diminishes quality of life, or our perceptions and experience of it, they confuse defining the concept of quality of life, understanding a general principle for it, and being able to individualize the criteria for different people. More important, quality of life is not the precise concept that is important and relevant in the issues that are of medical importance; there is a better, more precise concept to use— the concept of whether a treatment or life with particular circumstances is worthwhile. Quality of life is not commonly important in the practice of medicine outside of psychiatry; it is considered to be important, outside of psychiatry, mostly or only in regard to end-of-life care, radical treatment procedures, and rehabilitative medicine in the case of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, particularly when the latter two cause especially serious and devastating disability. In those cases, consideration of quality of life, as it is described in the literature, is a mistake for a number of reasons.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
January 09 2008
Quality of Life
Richard Garlikov
Richard Garlikov
1
Birmingham, Alabama
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2008) 13 (3): 53–69.
Citation
Richard Garlikov; Quality of Life. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 January 2008; 13 (3): 53–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1303-53
Download citation file:
23
Views
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team