Although approximately half of all people with spinal cord injury (SCI) have upper extremity (UE) dysfunction, there is a great deal of technology and focus on improving leg strength and retraining gait after SCI and not on UE strength and function. The principles of activity-based interventions, which involve intense activity to access and improve spinal cord circuitry and to produce long-lasting neural and functional changes, are being routinely translated to rehabilitation of the lower extremities in individuals with SCI. Activity-based approaches may be useful for facilitating long-term neural and functional changes in the UE as well. Yet, the understanding of how to facilitate UE movement in tetraplegia and how to develop and apply new approaches or technology to improve UE function is significantly lacking. This article evaluates the literature pertaining to the use of activity-based interventions to improve UE function after SCI and discusses the relevance of evidence for activity-based interventions in the stroke population as well as that from the literature examining the effects of activity-based interventions for retraining the lower extremity after SCI to determine whether activity-based interventions may be useful for retraining arm and hand function after SCI.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
May 08 2008
Activity-Based Interventions for the Upper Extremity in Spinal Cord Injury
Deborah Backus
Deborah Backus
1
Deptartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, and Clinical Research Scientist, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, Georgia
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2008) 13 (4): 1–9.
Citation
Deborah Backus; Activity-Based Interventions for the Upper Extremity in Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 April 2008; 13 (4): 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1304-1
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team