Technological advances afford individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) the ability to improve locomotor function through the use of body weight—supported (BWS) treadmill training. Rehabilitation providers now have the choice of BWS manual and robotic (i.e., Lokomat/Autoambulator) locomotor training (LT) systems to provide training in a safe treadmill environment. Several lines of evidence suggest that individuals with motor incomplete SCI who participate in intense LT can improve walking abilities and that these changes can be maintained for several months to years post LT. Health-related benefits of LT include increases in cross-sectional area of muscle, improved perception of health and physical capacity, and ultimately improved quality of life. Clinicians are challenged in making sound clinical decisions about which device to use, or in which order if both are available, due to the paucity of research comparing the manual and robotic systems for neural, functional, or health-related benefits after SCI. This article discusses evidence related to the manual and robotic systems for LT and describes the application of this evidence in developing a clinical decision-making algorithm for the use of manual and robotic LT in a postacute rehabilitation program for individuals with incomplete SCI.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
July 30 2008
Incorporating Manual and Robotic Locomotor Training into Clinical Practice: Suggestions for Clinical Decision Making
Deborah Backus;
Deborah Backus
1
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shepherd Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Search for other works by this author on:
Candace Tefertiller
Candace Tefertiller
2
Beyond Therapy, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, Georgia
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2008) 14 (1): 23–38.
Citation
Deborah Backus, Candace Tefertiller; Incorporating Manual and Robotic Locomotor Training into Clinical Practice: Suggestions for Clinical Decision Making. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 July 2008; 14 (1): 23–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1401-23
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team