During a time of intense interest in neural recovery, there is strong emphasis on quantification of clinical outcomes. To promote responsible outcome measurement, a review of commonly used ambulation assessments was conducted, with an emphasis on application to the population with spinal cord injury (SCI). Each ambulation/walking assessment tool addressed includes a description of the examination, review of statistical support, and information on the utility of the assessment. Ambulation assessment measures are categorized by the variable being measured and considered for use either independently or in combination. In summary, no one assessment quantifies all parameters of ambulation, and comprehensive measurement is completed by using a combination of ambulation/walking assessments to document improvement in walking function after an SCI.
Resnick B, et al. Measurement of activity in older adults: reliability and validity of the Step Activity Monitor. J Nurs Measure. 2001;9(3):275–290.
,
Measurement of activity in older adults: reliability and validity of the Step Activity Monitor
, J Nurs Measure
, vol. 9
(pg. 275
-290
) McDonald C, et al. Utility of a Step Activity Monitor for the measurement of daily ambulatory activity in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:793–801.
,
Utility of a Step Activity Monitor for the measurement of daily ambulatory activity in children
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 86
(pg. 793
-801
) Shepherd E, et al. Step activity monitor: increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(5):703–708.
,
Step activity monitor: increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity
, J Orthop Res.
, vol. 17
(pg. 703
-708
) Patrick M, Ditunno P, Ditunno JF. A Comparison of spinal cord injury (SCI) consumers/staff preference for walking: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1).
,
A Comparison of spinal cord injury (SCI) consumers/staff preference for walking: a pilot study
, Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 26
van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V. Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2): 190–196.
,
Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 86
(pg. 190
-196
) Lam T, et al. A systematic review of the ef-ficacy of gait rehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2007;13:32–57.
,
A systematic review of the efficacy of gait rehabilitation strategies for spinal cord injury
, Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil
, vol. 13
(pg. 32
-57
) Ditunno JF, Burns A, Marino RJ. Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trails. J Rehab Res Dev. 2005;42(3; Suppl 1):35–42.
,
Neurological and functional capacity outcome measures: essential to spinal cord injury clinical trails
, J Rehab Res Dev.
, vol. 42
(pg. 35
-42
) Waters RL, et al. Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from Standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:756–760.
,
Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from Standards of the American Spinal Injury Association
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 75
(pg. 756
-760
) Hussey RW, Stauffer ES. Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973;54:544–547.
,
Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 54
(pg. 544
-547
) Kim CM, Eng JJ, Whittaker MW. Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:156–162.
,
Level walking and ambulatory capacity in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with muscle strength
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 42
(pg. 156
-162
) Ditunno JF. Outcome measures. In: Meeting of the International Spinal Cord Society; 2004; Athens.
Marino RJ. Uses and limitations of impairment and activity outcome measures. An interdisciplinary approach to neurotrauma care. Paper presented at JW Marriot Hotel, Washington, DC; April 25, 2005.
Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliabiity comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):9–13.
,
Validity and reliabiity comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 82
(pg. 9
-13
) Catz A, et al. SCIM — spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:850–856.
,
SCIM — spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 35
(pg. 850
-856
) Ditunno JF, et al. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): an international multi-center validity and reliability study. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:234–243.
,
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): an international multi-center validity and reliability study
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 38
(pg. 234
-243
) MacSween A, et al. A validation of the 10-meter Incremental Shuttle Walk Test as a measure of aerobic power in cardiac and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:807–810.
,
A validation of the 10-meter Incremental Shuttle Walk Test as a measure of aerobic power in cardiac and rheumatoid arthritis patients
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 82
(pg. 807
-810
) State University of New York. Guide for Use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation Including the Functional Independence Measure—Version 5. Buffalo, NY: Research Foundation, SUNY;1996.
Podsiadlo P, Richardson S. The timed “up and go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
,
The timed “up and go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons
, J Am Geriatr Soc.
, vol. 39
(pg. 142
-148
) Witte U, Carlsson J. Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29(3):161–165.
,
Carlsson J. Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke
, Scand J Rehabil Med.
, vol. 29
(pg. 161
-165
) Burns A, et al. The relationship of ambulatory speed and efficiency to WISCI level in chronic SCI. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):543.
,
The relationship of ambulatory speed and efficiency to WISCI level in chronic SCI
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 26
pg. 543
van Hedel HJ, Dietz V, Curt A. Assessment of walking speed and distance in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:295–301.
,
Assessment of walking speed and distance in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury
, Neurorehabil Neural Repair
, vol. 21
(pg. 295
-301
) Mathias S, Nayak USL, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:387–389.
,
Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 67
(pg. 387
-389
) Morris S, Morris ME, Iansek R, Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed “Up & Go” test in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2001;81(2):810–818.
,
Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed “Up & Go” test in people with Parkinson disease
, Phys Ther.
, vol. 81
(pg. 810
-818
) Schoppen T, et al. The timed “up and go” test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(7):825–828.
,
The timed “up and go” test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 80
(pg. 825
-828
) Berg KO, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1073–1080.
,
Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 73
(pg. 1073
-1080
) van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Curt A. Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(6):352–356.
,
Improving walking assessment in subjects with an incomplete spinal cord injury: responsiveness
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 44
(pg. 352
-356
) Wirz M, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:672–680.
,
Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 86
(pg. 672
-680
) Hornby TG, Zemon D, Campbell D. Robotic-assisted body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005;85(1):52–66.
,
Robotic-assisted body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury
, Phys Ther.
, vol. 85
(pg. 52
-66
) Brooks D, et al. Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with trans-tibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1562–1565.
,
Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with trans-tibial amputation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 83
(pg. 1562
-1565
) Enright P. The six-minute walk test. Respiratory Care. 2003;48(8):783–785.
,
The six-minute walk test
, Respiratory Care
, vol. 48
(pg. 783
-785
) Cooper KH. A means of assessing maximal oxygen uptake: correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA. 1968;203:201–204.
,
A means of assessing maximal oxygen uptake: correlation between field and treadmill testing
, JAMA
, vol. 203
(pg. 201
-204
) American Thoracic Society Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratores of ATS, ATS Statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–117.
Dobkin BH, et al. Methods for a randomized clinical trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:153–167.
,
Methods for a randomized clinical trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury
, Neurorehabil Neural Repair
, vol. 17
(pg. 153
-167
) Brooks D, et al. The two-minute walk test as a measure of functional capacity in cardiac surgery patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1525–1530.
,
The two-minute walk test as a measure of functional capacity in cardiac surgery patients
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 85
(pg. 1525
-1530
) Butland R, et al. Two, six, and 12 minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J. 1982;284:1607–1608.
,
Two, six, and 12 minute walking tests in respiratory disease
, Br Med J
, vol. 284
(pg. 1607
-1608
) Brooks D, et al. The 2-minute walk test as a measure of functional improvement in persons with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1478–1483.
,
The 2-minute walk test as a measure of functional improvement in persons with lower limb amputation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 82
(pg. 1478
-1483
) Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(1):103–108.
,
Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke
, J Rehabil Res Dev
, vol. 42
(pg. 103
-108
) Soloway S, et al. A qualitative systematic review of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001;119:256–270.
,
A qualitative systematic review of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain
, Chest
, vol. 119
(pg. 256
-270
) Teasell, R., et al. Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:506–516.
,
Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 81
(pg. 506
-516
) Stewart M, et al. The measurement properties of fitness measures and health status for persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(4):394–400.
,
The measurement properties of fitness measures and health status for persons with spinal cord injuries
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 81
(pg. 394
-400
) Dallmeijer, A., et al. Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion capacity during rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3, Suppl 1):55–63.
,
Hand-rim wheelchair propulsion capacity during rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury
, J Rehabil Res Dev
, vol. 42
(pg. 55
-63
) Phillips W, et al. Effect of spinal cord injury on the heart and cardiovascular fitness. Curr Problems Cardiol. 1998;23(11):683.
,
Effect of spinal cord injury on the heart and cardiovascular fitness
, Curr Problems Cardiol
, vol. 23
pg. 683
Clinical exercise resting. In: Franklin BA, ed. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:93–114.
,
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription
, Clinical exercise resting
(pg. -) Ulkar B, et al. Energy expenditure of the paraplegic gait: comparison between different walking aids and normal subjects. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(3):213–217.
,
Energy expenditure of the paraplegic gait: comparison between different walking aids and normal subjects
, Int J Rehabil Res
, vol. 26
(pg. 213
-217
) McDonough AL, et al. The validity and reliability of the GAITRite System’s measurements: a preliminary evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:419–425.
,
The validity and reliability of the GAITRite System’s measurements: a preliminary evaluation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 82
(pg. 419
-425
) Bilney B, Morris M, Webster K. Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait. Gait Posture. 2003;17:68–74.
,
Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait
, Gait Posture
, vol. 17
(pg. 68
-74
) Cutlip RG, et al. Evaluation of an instrumented walkway for measurement of the kinematic parameters of gait. Gait Posture. 2000;12(2):134–138.
,
Evaluation of an instrumented walkway for measurement of the kinematic parameters of gait
, Gait Posture
, vol. 12
(pg. 134
-138
) Menz HB, et al. Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of tem-poro-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait Posture. 2004;20:20–25.
,
Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of tem-poro-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people
, Gait Posture
, vol. 20
(pg. 20
-25
) Kadaba, M., et al. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Res. 1989;7:849–860.
,
Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait
, J Orthop Res
, vol. 7
(pg. 849
-860
) Krebs D, Edelstein J, Fishman S. Reliability of observational kinematic gait analysis. Phys Ther. 1985;65:1027–1033.
,
Reliability of observational kinematic gait analysis
, Phys Ther
, vol. 65
(pg. 1027
-1033
) Kay R., et al. The effect of preoperative gait analysis on orthopedic decision-making. Clin Orthop. 2000;372:217–222.
,
The effect of preoperative gait analysis on orthopedic decision-making
, Clin Orthop
, vol. 372
(pg. 217
-222
) Smith PA, et al. Gait analysis in children and adolescents with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S44–49.
,
Gait analysis in children and adolescents with spinal cord injuries
, J Spinal Cord Med
, vol. 27
(pg. S44
-49
) Field-Fote EC, et al. The Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI). J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(4):177–181.
,
The Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI)
, J Rehabil Med
, vol. 33
(pg. 177
-181
) Perry J, et al. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke. 1995;26:982–989.
,
Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population
, Stroke
, vol. 26
(pg. 982
-989
) World Health Organization. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health — ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2002:1–21.
Morganti B, et al. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): criterion validation. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(1):27–33.
,
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): criterion validation
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 43
(pg. 27
-33
) Ditunno PL, Dittuno JF. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:654–656.
,
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II): scale revision
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 39
(pg. 654
-656
) Ditunno JF, et al. Inter rater reliability of photo documentation for scoring the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(2):142.
,
Inter rater reliability of photo documentation for scoring the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI)
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 28
pg. 142
Kim M, et al. The assessment of walking capacity using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury: self-selected versus maximal levels. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(6): 762–767.
,
The assessment of walking capacity using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury: self-selected versus maximal levels
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil
, vol. 88
(pg. 762
-767
) Ditunno JF, Dobkin BH. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI): response to change in a clinical trial (SCILT) and setting (TJU). In: Program and abstracts of the International Campaign for Cures of SCI Paralysis (ICCP); 2004; Vancouver, Canada.
Ditunno JF, Dobkin BH, SCILT Group. Prospective validity & responsiveness to change of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in a randomized clinical trial. In: Meeting of the International Spinal Cord Society; 2004; Athens.
SCILT, Group. ,
Prospective validity & responsiveness to change of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in a randomized clinical trial
, 2004
Ditunno JF, et al. Validation and refinement of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in a clinical setting. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(2):160.
,
Validation and refinement of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in a clinical setting
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 27
pg. 160
Ditunno JF, et al., Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and other domains of function in a multicenter clinical trial. Neuro-rehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21(6):539–550.
,
Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and other domains of function in a multicenter clinical trial
, Neuro-rehabil Neural Repair.
, vol. 21
(pg. 539
-550
) Steeves JD, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:206–221.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 45
(pg. 206
-221
) Marino R, et al. Relationship between Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) level, neurological status, walking speed in SCI. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl I):S38.
,
Relationship between Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) level, neurological status, walking speed in SCI
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 26
pg. S38
Burns AS, et al. Correlation of Borg rating to physiologic cost index (PCI) and total heart beat index (THBI) for the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(3):339.
,
Correlation of Borg rating to physiologic cost index (PCI) and total heart beat index (THBI) for the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI)
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 29
pg. 339
Bowden M, Behrman A. Step Activity Monitor: accuracy and test-retest reliability in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(3):355–362.
,
Step Activity Monitor: accuracy and test-retest reliability in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury
, J Rehabil Res Dev.
, vol. 44
(pg. 355
-362
) Shaughnessy M, et al. Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1305–1307.
,
Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery
, Stroke
, vol. 36
(pg. 1305
-1307
) Silva M, et al. Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(6):693–697.
,
Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity
, J Arthroplasty
, vol. 17
(pg. 693
-697
) Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14(2):61–65.
,
Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index
, Md State Med J.
, vol. 14
(pg. 61
-65
) Scivoletto G, et al. Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients’ rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:457–464.
,
Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients’ rehabilitation
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 41
(pg. 457
-464
) Catz A, et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(6):263–268.
,
The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 23
(pg. 263
-268
) Catz A, Itzkovitch M, Tesio L, et al. A mul-ticenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(4):275–291.
,
A mul-ticenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 45
(pg. 275
-291
) Catz A, et al. The spinal cord independence measure (SCIM): sensitivity to functional changes in subgroups of spinal cord lesion patients. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(2):97–100.
,
The spinal cord independence measure (SCIM): sensitivity to functional changes in subgroups of spinal cord lesion patients
, Spinal Cord
, vol. 39
(pg. 97
-100
) Itzkovich MA, et al. Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(4):267–272.
,
Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation
, Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 267
-272
)
This content is only available as a PDF.
