This article reviews three measures of participation in a large spinal cord injury sample: the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF), the PAR-PRO, and the Community Integration Measure (CIM). The first two are based on quantitative assessment and the CIM is subjective. The PAR-PRO and CIM demonstrated adequate reliability. Factor analysis of the CIM indicated that it measures a single construct. A five-factor solution was obtained for the PAR-PRO, the interpretation of which was unclear. The CHART scales and PAR-PRO were more closely associated with functional measures and the CIM with scores measuring quality of life. All measures were associated with health perceptions.
World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF.
World Health Organization.International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease.
Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):552–557.
,
Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 73
(pg. 552
-557
) American Spinal Injury Association.International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2002. Chicago, IL: ASIA; 2002.
,
American Spinal Injury Association
, International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2002.
Steeves JD, Lammertse D, Curt A, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures.Spinal Cord. 2007;45:206–221.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 206
-221
) Keith R, Granger C, Hamilton B, Sherwin F. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg M, Grzesiak R, eds.Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. New York: Springer Publishing Co; 1987:618.
,
The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In
, Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation.
Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional Independence Staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(1):29–37.
,
Functional Independence Staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 84
(pg. 29
-37
) Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
,
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection
, Med Care.
, vol. 30
(pg. 473
-483
) Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap - a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519–526.
,
Quantifying handicap - a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 73
(pg. 519
-526
) Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(8):1043–1051.
,
Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 87
(pg. 1043
-1051
) Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11–12):577–587.
,
Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 25
(pg. 577
-587
) Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities.Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1445–1460
,
What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 30
(pg. 1445
-1460
) Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for?Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11–2):596–601.
,
The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for?
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 25
(pg. 596
-601
) Magasi SR, Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG, Quality of Life/Participation Committee. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research.J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(2):145–156.
,
Quality of Life/Participation Committee. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 31
(pg. 145
-156
) Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for postacute care (PM-PAC).Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(1):5771.
,
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for postacute care (PM-PAC)
, Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 86
Craig Hospital Research Department.Short- Form Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 2000.
,
Craig Hospital Research Department
, Short- Form Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique.
McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):429–434.
,
The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 429
-434
) Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring topics.Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil. 1998;4(1):16–30.
,
The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring topics
, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil.
, vol. 4
(pg. 16
-30
) World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning and Disability - Beta-2. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Functioning and Disability - Beta-2.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;41:71–75.
,
The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess
, vol. 41
(pg. 71
-75
) SPSS Statistics. Version V17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc; 2009.
,
SPSS Statistics. Version V17.0
, International Classification of Functioning and Disability - Beta-2.
Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(12):936–941.
,
Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique
, Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 936
-941
) Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. The use of proxies in community integration research.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1018–1024.
,
The use of proxies in community integration research
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 1018
-1024
) Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In: Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin L, eds.Workshop on Disability in America, A New Look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006:50–66.
,
Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In
, Workshop on Disability in America, A New Look.
(pg. 50
-66
) Post MWM, de Witte LP, Schrijvers AJP. Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research.Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:5–15.
,
Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research
, Clin Rehabil.
, vol. 13
(pg. 5
-15
)
This content is only available as a PDF.