Participation is an important outcome for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), but very few participation instruments have been tested in this population. Using a sample of persons with SCI, this study directly compared the measurement properties of three instruments: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), the Participation Measure-Post Acute Care (PM-PAC), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II). Ceiling effects were common among all the instruments. Reliability (internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficients, and minimal detectable change) and construct validity were superior for the IPA. However, the PM-PAC and WHODAS II had adequate measurement properties across most domains.
World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization;
World Health Organization.International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to Consequences of Diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. A Manual of Classification Relating to Consequences of Diseases.
Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement.J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29:147–156.
,
Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement
, J Neurol Phys Ther.
, vol. 29
(pg. 147
-156
) Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition.Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:27–35.
,
Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition
, Clin Rehabil.
, vol. 16
(pg. 27
-35
) Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations.Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:170–180.
,
Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 22
(pg. 170
-180
) Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Dvorak MF. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1883–1901.
,
A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
, Disabil Rehabil
, vol. 31
(pg. 1883
-1901
) Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:210–216.
,
Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 210
-216
) Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post- Acute Care (PM-PAC).Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;86:57–71.
,
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post- Acute Care (PM-PAC)
, Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 86
(pg. 57
-71
) World Health Organization. WHODAS II. Available at: http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas. Revised November 2001. Accessed March 10, 2006. http://www.who.int/icidh/whodas.
Magasi SR, Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research.J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:145–156.
,
Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 31
(pg. 145
-156
) Noonan VK, Miller WC, Noreau L. A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury.Spinal Cord. 2009;47:435–446.
,
A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 47
(pg. 435
-446
) World Health Organization.International Classification of Functioning and Disability Beta-2 Draft Full Version. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
,
World Health Organization
, International Classification of Functioning and Disability Beta-2 Draft Full Version.
Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspang B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury.J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:156–162.
,
Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury
, J Rehabil Med.
, vol. 39
(pg. 156
-162
) Lund ML, Nordlund A, Bernspang B, Lexell J. Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury.Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1417–1422.
,
Perceived participation and problems in participation are determinants of life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 29
(pg. 1417
-1422
) Hoenig H, McIntyre L, Sloane R, et al. The reliability of a self-reported measure of disease, impairment, and function in persons with spinal cord dysfunction.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:378–387.
,
The reliability of a self-reported measure of disease, impairment, and function in persons with spinal cord dysfunction
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 79
(pg. 378
-387
) Hoenig H, Branch LG, McIntyre L, Hoff J, Horner RD. The validity in persons with spinal cord injury of a self-reported functional measure derived from the functional independence measure.Spine. 1999;24:539–543.
,
The validity in persons with spinal cord injury of a self-reported functional measure derived from the functional independence measure
, Spine.
, vol. 24
(pg. 539
-543
) Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status.J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:239–246.
,
Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status
, J Rehabil Med.
, vol. 34
(pg. 239
-246
) Hudson M, Steele R, Taillefer S, Baron M. Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:270–278.
,
Quality of life in systemic sclerosis: psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II
, Arthritis Rheum.
, vol. 59
(pg. 270
-278
) Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, et al. WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives.Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:855–864.
,
WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 31
(pg. 855
-864
) Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research.Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:156–163.
,
The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research
, Arthritis Rheum.
, vol. 49
(pg. 156
-163
) Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S50–S56.
,
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 26
(pg. S50
-S56
) Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
,
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
, J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol. 60
(pg. 34
-42
) Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205.
,
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria
, Qual Life Res.
, vol. 11
(pg. 193
-205
) McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr., Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.
,
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs
, Med Care.
, vol. 31
(pg. 247
-263
) Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD et al. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population.Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:793–803.
,
Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population
, Clin Rehabil.
, vol. 20
(pg. 793
-803
) Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients.Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1521–1531.
,
Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients
, Qual Life Res.
, vol. 16
(pg. 1521
-1531
) Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, McArdle R, Wilson RH, Doyle PJ. The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss.Trends Amplif. 2005;9:111–126.
,
The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss
, Trends Amplif.
, vol. 9
(pg. 111
-126
) van Baalen B, Odding E, van Woensel MP, Roebroeck ME. Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population.Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:686–700.
,
Reliability and sensitivity to change of measurement instruments used in a traumatic brain injury population
, Clin Rehabil.
, vol. 20
(pg. 686
-700
)
This content is only available as a PDF.
