The use of robotic devices in clinical rehabilitation settings has seen an explosion in the last 10 years. The purpose of this article is to describe the perspectives of therapists and administrators who are using and supporting the use of robotic devices for upper limb training in a clinical rehabilitation setting. In addition, this article addresses methods to establish best practices and measure outcomes associated with the robotic devices in a clinical, rather than research, setting. Overall, therapists and administrators who have experience using robotic devices in a clinical rehabilitation setting felt that robotic devices pose many opportunities for rehabilitation. First, these devices show promise as a potentially effective adjunct to existing therapy programs, particularly for individuals with severe upper limb neurological impairment. Clients are highly motivated to use the devices and are potentially able to obtain higher frequency and consistency of upper limb practice during their rehabilitation than with other intervention approaches. Second, robotic devices offer a potentially standard and repeatable intervention that can be used to examine outcomes of clinical rehabilitation programs. Finally, robotic devices could advance the science of rehabilitation by providing a platform for studying motor learning after upper limb neurological impairment. The clinical rehabilitation environment provides a good venue for studying the effectiveness of robotic devices in promoting motor recovery, providing that we establish guidelines to ensure consistency in the implementation and measurement of outcomes in these programs.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
July 14 2011
Applying Robotics in a Clinical Rehabilitation Setting for Upper Limb Neurological Impairment
Heather Livengood;
Heather Livengood
1
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2
Centers for Rehab Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizabeth Skidmore;
Elizabeth Skidmore
1
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
3
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
4
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Lynne Huber;
Lynne Huber
1
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
2
Centers for Rehab Services, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Sue Cox;
Sue Cox
1
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Scott Bleakley;
Scott Bleakley
3
Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael Boninger
Michael Boninger
1
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
4
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2011) 17 (1): 60–65.
Citation
Heather Livengood, Elizabeth Skidmore, Lynne Huber, Sue Cox, Scott Bleakley, Michael Boninger; Applying Robotics in a Clinical Rehabilitation Setting for Upper Limb Neurological Impairment. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 July 2011; 17 (1): 60–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1701-60
Download citation file:
48
Views
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team