The use of robotic devices in clinical rehabilitation settings has seen an explosion in the last 10 years. The purpose of this article is to describe the perspectives of therapists and administrators who are using and supporting the use of robotic devices for upper limb training in a clinical rehabilitation setting. In addition, this article addresses methods to establish best practices and measure outcomes associated with the robotic devices in a clinical, rather than research, setting. Overall, therapists and administrators who have experience using robotic devices in a clinical rehabilitation setting felt that robotic devices pose many opportunities for rehabilitation. First, these devices show promise as a potentially effective adjunct to existing therapy programs, particularly for individuals with severe upper limb neurological impairment. Clients are highly motivated to use the devices and are potentially able to obtain higher frequency and consistency of upper limb practice during their rehabilitation than with other intervention approaches. Second, robotic devices offer a potentially standard and repeatable intervention that can be used to examine outcomes of clinical rehabilitation programs. Finally, robotic devices could advance the science of rehabilitation by providing a platform for studying motor learning after upper limb neurological impairment. The clinical rehabilitation environment provides a good venue for studying the effectiveness of robotic devices in promoting motor recovery, providing that we establish guidelines to ensure consistency in the implementation and measurement of outcomes in these programs.

Nakayama H, Jorgenson H, Pedersen P, Raaschou H, Olsen S. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(4):394-398.
,
Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study
,
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol.
75
(pg.
394
-
398
)
Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21:247-251.
,
Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation
,
Stroke.
, vol.
21
(pg.
247
-
251
)
Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1772-1783.
,
Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke
,
N Engl J Med.
, vol.
362
(pg.
1772
-
1783
)
Krebs HI, Dipietro L, Ley-Tzedik S, et al. A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics: therapeutic robots enhance clinician productivity in facilitating patient recovery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27(4):61-70.
,
A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics: therapeutic robots enhance clinician productivity in facilitating patient recovery
,
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag.
, vol.
27
(pg.
61
-
70
)
Merholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2008;Issue 4.
,
Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke
,
Cochrane Database Systematic Rev.
Fitzgerald SG, Cooper RA, Thorman T, Cooper R, Guo S, Boninger ML. The GAME(Cycle) exercise system: a comparison to standard ergometry. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(5):453-459.
,
The GAME(Cycle) exercise system: a comparison to standard ergometry
,
J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol.
27
(pg.
453
-
459
)
Guo S, Grindle GG, Authier EL, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Kelleher AR, Cooper R. Development and qualitative assessment of the GAME(Cycle) exercise system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14(1):83-90.
,
Development and qualitative assessment of the GAME(Cycle) exercise system
,
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.
, vol.
14
(pg.
83
-
90
)
Brewer B, McDowell SK, Worther-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(6):22-44.
,
Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results
,
Top Stroke Rehabil.
, vol.
14
(pg.
22
-
44
)
Cooper RA, Dicianno BE, Brewer B, et al. A perspective on intelligent devices and environments in medical rehabilitation. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(10):1387-1398.
,
A perspective on intelligent devices and environments in medical rehabilitation
,
Med Eng Phys.
, vol.
30
(pg.
1387
-
1398
)
This content is only available as a PDF.