Effective treatment after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is imperative as so many activities of daily living (ADLs) are dependent on functional recovery of arm and hand actions. We focus on defining and comparing neurological and functional endpoints that might be used during acute or subacute Phase 2 clinical trials involving subjects with cervical sensorimotor complete SCI (ASIA Impairment Scale [AIS-A]). For the purposes of this review, the trial would examine the effects of a pharmaceutical small molecule, drug, biologic, or cell transplant on spinal tissue. Thus, neurological improvement is the intended consequence and is most directly measured by assessing neurological impairment (eg, motor aspects of the International Standards Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury [ISNCSCI]). However, changes in neurological function, even if statistically significant, may not be associated with a clear functional impact (ie, a meaningful improvement in individual activity, such as independent self-care ADLs). The challenge is to measure improvement as precisely as possible (change in impairment), but to define a clinically meaningful response in the context of functional improvement (impact on activity limitations). The principal comparisons focused on elements of the ISNCSCI assessment, including upper extremity motor score and motor level. Personal activity capabilities were also examined at various time points. The data suggest that an improvement of 2 or more motor levels after cervical sensorimotor complete SCI may be a clinically meaningful endpoint threshold that could be used for acute and subacute Phase 2 trials with subjects having sensorimotor complete cervical SCI.
Marino R, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (6th ed). J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S50–S56.
,
International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (6th ed)
, J Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 26
(pg. S50
-S56
) Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, Ring H, Tamir A. SCIM - spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:850-856.
,
SCIM - spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 35
(pg. 850
-856
) Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC. Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): impairment versus function. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2009;14(4):34-46.
,
Assessment of the hand in tetraplegia using the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): impairment versus function
, Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil.
, vol. 14
(pg. 34
-46
) Kalsi-Ryan S, Beaton D, Curt A, et al. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) – reliability and validity [published online ahead of print May 13, 2011]. J Neurotrauma.
,
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) – reliability and validity
, J Neurotrauma.
World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):190-205.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 190
-205
) Steeves JD, Lammertse D, Curt A, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):206-221.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial outcome measures
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 206
-221
) Steeves JD, Kramer JK, Fawcett JW, et al. Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:257-265.
,
Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 49
(pg. 257
-257
) Kramer JK, Lammertse DP, Shubert M, et al. Relationship between motor recovery and independence after sensorimotor complete cervical spinal cord injury. Neural Rehabil Neural Repair. Submitted for publication.
,
Relationship between motor recovery and independence after sensorimotor complete cervical spinal cord injury
, Neural Rehabil Neural Repair.
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1405-1411.
,
A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study
, N Engl J Med.
, vol. 322
(pg. 1405
-1411
) Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, et al. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26:S68–S86.
,
Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury
, Spine.
, vol. 26
(pg. S68
-S86
) Ditunno JF Jr, Cohen ME, Hauck WW, Jackson AB, Sipski ML. Recovery of upper-extremity strength in complete and incomplete tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:389-393.
,
Recovery of upper-extremity strength in complete and incomplete tetraplegia: a multicenter study
, Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 81
(pg. 389
-393
) Walker MD. Acute spinal-cord injury. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1885-1887.
,
Acute spinal-cord injury
, N Engl J Med.
, vol. 324
(pg. 1885
-1887
) Itzkovich M, Tamir A, Philo O, et al. Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:267-272.
,
Reliability of the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure assessment by interview and comparison with observation
, Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
, vol. 82
(pg. 267
-272
) Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, et al. A multi-center International Study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:291-275.
,
A multi-center International Study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version III: Rasch psychometric validation
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 275
-291
) Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1926-1933.
,
The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study
, Disabil Rehabil.
, vol. 29
(pg. 1926
-1933
) Anderson, K, Aito, S, Atkins, M, et al. Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: comparison by a multi-national work group. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:133-144.
,
Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: comparison by a multi-national work group
, J. Spinal Cord Med.
, vol. 31
(pg. 133
-144
) Glass CA, Tesio L, Itzkovich M, et al. Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):723-728.
,
pinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population
, J Rehabil Med.
, vol. 41
(pg. 723
-728
) Anderson KD, Acuff ME, Arp BG, et al. United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III). Spinal Cord. In press. doi: 10.1038/ sc.2011.20.
,
United States (US) multi-center study to assess the validity and reliability of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)
, Spinal Cord.
Bluvshtein V, Front L, Itzkovich M, et al. SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:292-296.
,
SCIM III is reliable and valid in a separate analysis for traumatic spinal cord lesions
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 49
(pg. 292
-296
) van Hedel HJA, Curt A. Fighting for each segment: estimating the clinical value of cervical and thoracic segments in SCI. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1621-1631.
,
Fighting for each segment: estimating the clinical value of cervical and thoracic segments in SCI
, J Neurotrauma.
, vol. 23
(pg. 1621
-1631
) Snapinn SM, Jiang Q. Responder analyses and the assessment of a clinically relevant treatment effect. Trials. 2007;8:31-36.
,
Responder analyses and the assessment of a clinically relevant treatment effect
, Trials.
, vol. 8
(pg. 31
-36
) Lammertse D, Tuszynski MH, Steeves JD, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial design. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):232-242.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial design
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 232
-232
) Tuszynski MH, Steeves JD, Fawcett JW, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(3):222-231.
,
Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics
, Spinal Cord.
, vol. 45
(pg. 222
-231
)
This content is only available as a PDF.
