The study aimed to evaluate the Needs Assessment Checklist (NAC) as a clinically appropriate assessment tool for use during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Data were obtained during routine clinical assessments from 193 patients admitted to the National Spinal Injuries Centre, UK, from September 2007 to November 2009. Reliability analyses yielded high internal consistency coefficients (mean α = .889, SD .051), and the mean item internal validity correlation was .534 (SD .136). All subscales of the NAC were found to be highly significant to change between administrations (mean P <.001). Several differences were found on the NAC subscales with respect to gender, age, and mobility. Pain and psychological issues were associated with poorer rehabilitation outcomes. The NAC is demonstrated to be a clinically reliable assessment tool that can be used to structure rehabilitation progress by the generation of person-centered goals. The results highlight the importance of assessing psychological issues and pain during SCI rehabilitation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
April 14 2012
Planning and Structuring Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: The Needs Assessment Checklist
Paul Kennedy;
Paul Kennedy
1
Oxford Doctoral Course in Clinical Psychology, University of Oxford, Isis Education Centre, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
2
Department of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Emilie Smithson;
Emilie Smithson
2
Department of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Laura Blakey
Laura Blakey
2
Department of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2012) 18 (2): 135–137.
Citation
Paul Kennedy, Emilie Smithson, Laura Blakey; Planning and Structuring Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: The Needs Assessment Checklist. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 April 2012; 18 (2): 135–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1802-135
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team