The management of chronic respiratory insufficiency and/or long-term inability to breathe independently has traditionally been via positive-pressure ventilation through a mechanical ventilator. Although life-sustaining, it is associated with limitations of function, lack of independence, decreased quality of life, sleep disturbance, and increased risk for infections. In addition, its mechanical and electronic complexity requires full understanding of the possible malfunctions by patients and caregivers. Ventilator-associated pneumonia, tracheal injury, and equipment malfunction account for common complications of prolonged ventilation, and respiratory infections are the most common cause of death in spinal cord-injured patients. The development of functional electric stimulation (FES) as an alternative to mechanical ventilation has been motivated by a goal to improve the quality of life of affected individuals. In this article, we will review the physiology, types, characteristics, risks and benefits, surgical techniques, and complications of the 2 commercially available FES strategies - phrenic nerve pacing (PNP) and diaphragm motor point pacing (DMPP).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Original Article|
September 20 2012
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care
Renata Jarosz;
Renata Jarosz
1
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Meagan Littlepage;
Meagan Littlepage
1
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham Creasey;
Graham Creasey
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
3
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, San Jose, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen McKenna
Stephen McKenna
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
4
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2012) 18 (4): 315–321.
Citation
Renata Jarosz, Meagan Littlepage, Graham Creasey, Stephen McKenna; Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 October 2012; 18 (4): 315–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1804-315
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team