Background: Caregiver burden (CB) is a consequence of providing care to people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, there is a lack of clarity about the influence of secondary conditions of care recipients on family caregivers. Secondary conditions refer to the physical and psychological complications that can occur after SCI and lead to increased hospitalization and reduced functionality, quality of life, and social participation. Objective: To assess the impact of physical and psychological secondary conditions of people with SCI on the perceived burden of family caregivers. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study of 56 dyads of family caregivers and individuals with SCI in two urban spinal units in Italy and Ireland. Care recipients completed a toolset consisting of demographic information and assessments of functional, physical, and psychological health. Caregivers completed a multidimensional measure of CB. Bivariate data analysis was used. Results: No significant differences between centers were identified. CB was found to be related to physical secondary conditions and functional independence but not to mental health of care recipients. Bladder dysfunction and urinary tract infections influenced all dimensions of CB, whereas pressure injuries influenced only the time-dependent dimension. Level and completeness of injury and duration of caregiving increased CB. Conclusion: Findings indicate the value of a reduction in secondary conditions not just for individuals with SCI but also for their family caregivers. To reduce the individual and family burden of secondary conditions, a two-pronged, multidimensional approach, focusing on self-management for care recipients and psychoeducational support for caregivers, is required.

Caregiver burden (CB), defined by Zarit et al as “the extent to which caregivers recognize that caregiving has hurt their emotional, social, financial, physical and spiritual functioning”1(p261) is a well-recognized concern among caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).2,3 CB has been described as a multidimensional experience affecting physical, mental, and social aspects of caregiver health that contributes to a decrease in quality of life (QoL) of family members.4,5 Caregivers' neglect of their own health may contribute to dissatisfaction or strain on relationships and thereby reduce the support they provide for independent functioning in care recipients.6 The many consequences of SCI cause several stressors for families, with many caregivers describing symptoms compatible with depression.7 Moreover, costs related to SCI and the need for continued assistance of care recipients may subject caregivers to economic deterioration and reduced social participation.8 

The majority of family members who assume caregiving responsibilities describe a sense of being mentally strained by the situation, expressing a decline in overall satisfaction with life, reduced cognitive function, and increased levels of psychological disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and distress.4 Despite this, several aspects of caregiving were described as emotionally rewarding, such as confirming family ties with the care recipient8 and a feeling of well-being resulting from shared coping processes.9 

Individuals with SCI report physical or psychological secondary conditions resulting from reduced functionality, QoL, and social participation.10 The prevention, treatment, or cure of secondary conditions has a significant impact on the everyday life of both caregivers and care recipients. Urinary tract infections (UTIs),11 bowel issues,12 pressure injuries (PrIs),13 pain,14 and spasticity15 are the most common complications reported by people with SCI, and 36% to 40% report frequent hospital readmissions in the first 2 years after SCI.16 Due to the time and energy involved in preventing PrIs in their relatives,17 caregivers can experience high perceived burden and poor QoL. The complexity of tasks and the need for constant commitment to these tasks, such as continence care, can limit caregivers' social life and lead to stigma and isolation.18,19 Psychological adjustment after SCI is complex, and anxiety and depression, although not inevitable, are common comorbidities.20 Psychological distress may contribute to impairment in function and adaptation after SCI21 and has been linked to social isolation amongst caregivers of people with neurological diseases.22,23 

Even though caregivers of people with SCI show an adaptation trajectory characterized by a significant reduction of psychological distress and increased QoL, the level of CB remains stable over time.3 Predictors of CB in SCI have been identified as female gender, higher age, level of support provided, and care recipient's dependence.24 However, there is limited knowledge about the relationship between specific secondary conditions affecting people with SCI and dimensions of CB. To date only limited research, using nonvalidated instruments, on the influence of complications and psychological issues on CB is available.24 Existing research on QoL and the influence of secondary conditions on CB has not resulted in significant findings25 or has focused on a singular secondary condition.26 Given the potential clinical value of a comprehensive exploration of the influence of secondary conditions of care recipients on families' outcomes, this study aimed to describe the relationship between psychological and physical secondary conditions of SCI and the perceived burden experienced by family caregivers.

This study used a cross-sectional design. Data were collected between March and November 2018 from a consecutive sample of 56 dyads of family caregivers and people with SCI. Participants were enrolled at outpatient clinics in spinal units of the Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital Turin, Italy, and the National Rehabilitation Hospital Dublin, Ireland. A family caregiver was defined as an individual, related by blood or partnership, who provides informal assistance to a relative with SCI. Family caregivers of people with traumatic or nontraumatic SCI discharged at least 6 months from rehabilitation and aged 18 years or older were included. Formal, paid caregivers, as well as individuals with cognitive impairments or mixed diagnoses (eg, brain injury), were excluded. Sociodemographic data of recruited dyads are presented in Table 1. Caregivers were mainly females (n = 47; 84%), married (n = 42; 75%), and almost all lived with their relatives with SCI (n = 47; 84%). Spouses represented more than half of the sample (n = 29; 52%). Care recipients had mostly paraplegia (n = 31; 55%) and SCI of traumatic etiology (n = 42; 75%). More than half of participants had an incomplete injury (n = 31; 55%).

Table 1.

Sample characteristics (N = 56)

Sample characteristics (N = 56)
Sample characteristics (N = 56)

Procedure

Ethical approval was obtained from both centers before the commencement of the study (resolution no. CS2/596; March 13, 2018). Validation of a novel scale measuring self-care in people with SCI was the overall aim of the study protocol, and participation of family caregivers was an optional component. All applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed. In particular, anonymity and confidential treatment of data were maintained during the research process. Participants were recruited during routine follow-up appointments at outpatient clinics in each spinal unit. As care recipients with SCI were also being recruited for this study, and to ensure privacy and avoid comparison of responses, two distinct sets of self-report assessment tools, taking approximately 15 minutes, were completed independently. A total of 35 Italian and 21 Irish dyads participated. The following data were collected.

Sociodemographic information was collected as follows: Participants provided information on age, gender, marital status, level of education, presence of an income, cohabitation, and number of children. Care recipients provided information on level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), completeness (complete/incomplete), etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic), time since injury, and details about the presence of private assistants and health care utilization. Caregivers provided information on relationship with care recipient, years of caregiving, total hours spent providing care, and perceived economic impact.

Functional independence of care recipients was assessed with the modified Barthel Index (MBI).27 This 10-item questionnaire assesses functional ability in activities of daily living and shows excellent psychometric properties (Cronbach's α= .88) in an SCI population.28 Scores range from 0 (total dependence) to 100 (independence).

Physical secondary conditions were measured with the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS).29 This 16-item, self-report questionnaire contains the most common physical complications related to SCI including skin, pain, cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal, metabolic, sexual, bladder, and bowel functions. A score of 0 (absence of significant issues in the last 3 months) to 3 (chronic condition) is provided for each item. The total attainable score is 48, with higher scores indicating more serious physical secondary conditions. The SCI-SCS has shown satisfactory psychometric properties, even when administered by telephone (Cronbach's α = .76).29,30 

Quality of life was evaluated using the eight-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8).31 This eight-item instrument provides physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The SF-8 uses norm-based scoring whereby values of more or less than 50 are respectively considered better or worse than expected for the general population.

Depression was assessed with the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a multipurpose questionnaire for screening severity of depression and manifestation of suicidal ideation.32 PHQ-9 scores range from 0 to 27 and are subdivided into four categories indicating mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. The PHQ-9 has been shown to have excellent internal consistency on the SCI population (Cronbach's α = .83).33 

Anxiety was measured with a General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale. This seven-item, self-administered tool provides scores varying from 0 to 21 and is divided into three categories indicating mild, moderate, and severe anxiety.34 It is considered reasonably good at screening panic, social anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorders and has been applied to several populations affected by chronic diseases with excellent psychometric qualities (Cronbach's α = .92).35 

Caregiver burden was assessed using the Caregiver Burden Inventory in Spinal Cord Injury (CBI-SCI), a 24-item, self-report questionnaire composed of five subscales assessing the impact of burden on different domains36: time-dependent burden (T/dep-B), indicating stress resulting from reduced personal time; developmental burden (Dev-B), evaluating the sense of failing regarding one's life intentions; physical burden (Phys-B), measuring bodily strain; social burden (Soc-B), indicating the difficulties in fulfilling family or work roles; and emotional burden (Emot-B), referring to shaming caused by care recipients. The total CBI-SCI score ranges from a minimum of 0, indicating the absence of burden, to a maximum of 100, indicating the highest level of burden. This validated multidimensional tool capable of identifying characteristic elements of CB has excellent psychometric properties (Cronbach's α = .92).

Data analysis

Statistical analysis of data was carried out using the IBM SPSS program (Version 22) for Windows. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics of the sample and the results obtained from administered questionnaires. Means and standard deviations were applied to define continuous variables, and frequency distributions were gathered from categorical data.

T-tests for independent groups were used to highlight differences between the obtained CBI-SCI means and some participants' sociodemographic variables, identified on the basis of literature and researchers' clinical experience. To allow data analysis, nondichotomized variables were converted as follows: time since injury (<3 years/>3 years), marital status (in a relationship/not in a relationship), relationship (partner/relative), level of education (low/high), last hospitalization (<1 year/>1 year), caregiving hours (<8 hours/>8 hours), and years of caregiving (<3 years/>3 years).

To assess the relationship between CB and the psychological and physical secondary conditions of care recipients, several bivariate analyses were performed between the results of the CBI-SCI and sociodemographic variables. Product moment correlations between caregiver burden and functional independence (MBI), quality of life (SF-8), and physical (SCI-SCS) and mental complications(PHQ-9,GAD-7) were calculated. To explore the influence of secondary complications on caregiver burden, the correlations between every item of the SCI-SCS and CBI-SCI and its dimensions were calculated. Pearson's coefficient (r) was determined as follows: a value of ± 0.30 was considered to be a weak correlation, a value of ± 0.50 was considered a moderate correlation, and a value of ± 0.70 was considered a strong correlation.37 If necessary, scores of continuous variables that were not normally distributed were log-transformed. All tests were two-tailed, and a p value < .05 was considered significant.

No significant differences were identified between Italians and Irish participants: They lived generally less than 10 kilometers from their health care provider (n = 36; 65%), who was most frequently identified as a general practitioner (n = 32; 58%), and whom they visited approximately every 6 months (n = 37; 66%). The majority of individuals with SCI had been rehospitalized during the previous year (n = 32; 57%). A small number lived alone (n = 7; 13%) or in an isolated area (n = 9; 16%), while almost a quarter of care recipients had a private assistant (n = 13; 23%).

Table 2 presents the questionnaire results. Higher scores were obtained on the Time-Dependent and Physical Burden dimensions of the CBI-SCI, while Emotional Burden was ranked lowest. The majority of care recipients reported moderate functional independence (n = 39; 69%). Spasticity was rated as the most frequent complication by two-thirds of the sample (n = 37; 66%), while UTIs (n = 32; 56%) and joint/articular pain (n = 30; 53%) were present in more than half. Less common physical secondary conditions were caused by loss of sensation (n = 6; 11%) and heterotopic bone ossification (n = 8; 14%). Mean scores for physical and mental components on the SF-8 were 41.8 (SD ± 9.5) and 50.8 (SD ± 11.2), while the majority of care recipients reported few symptoms of both depression (n = 48; 86%) and anxiety (n = 49; 87%).

Table 2.

Scores of the administered tools

Scores of the administered tools
Scores of the administered tools

Statistically significant differences (Table 3) were identified between the CBI-SCI for injury level (p < .05) and completeness of injury (p< .01). Caregivers with lower education showed statistically significant higher levels of burden (p= .05); this was also true for those providing care for more than 3 years (p < .01) and those providing more than 8 hours of caregiving daily (p < .01). No other statistically significant differences in sociodemographic variables were identified.

Table 3.

Differences between sociodemographic variables and CBI-SCI means

Differences between sociodemographic variables and CBI-SCI means
Differences between sociodemographic variables and CBI-SCI means

A summary of the bivariate analysis between dimensions of CBI-SCI and other variables are presented in Table 4. Physical complications were all correlated with at least one dimension of perceived burden. In contrast, no correlations were identified between the psychological status of care recipients and the level of burden among family caregivers. The Time-Dependent dimension of burden showed the highest number of correlations, most significantly with number of caregiving hours (r = 0.67; p < .01) and more moderately with functional level of care recipients (r = 0.47; p < .01). Emotional burden attained only a weak correlation with the SCI-SCS score (r = 0.27; p = .05).

Table 4.

Correlations between CBI-SCI, sociodemographic variables, and administered tools

Correlations between CBI-SCI, sociodemographic variables, and administered tools
Correlations between CBI-SCI, sociodemographic variables, and administered tools

Correlations between the dimensions of CBI-SCI and secondary conditions identified on the SCI-SCS were weak (Table 5). Pressure injuries were correlated with total CBI-SCI score (r = 0.30; p < .05) and time-dependent burden (r = 0.38; p < .01), highlighting the time-consuming nature of caregiving for SCI individuals affected by skin complications. Bladder dysfunction and UTIs showed correlations with all CBI-SCI dimensions, even including the developmental and physical aspects of burden. Similarly, chronic pain experienced by care recipients was weakly related to the developmental (r = 0.31; p = .02) and the emotional (r = 0.31; p = .02) burdens perceived by caregivers.

Table 5.

Correlations between CBI-SCI and physical secondary conditions

Correlations between CBI-SCI and physical secondary conditions
Correlations between CBI-SCI and physical secondary conditions

This study indicates that the burden experienced by family caregivers of people with SCI is directly related to the extent of physical secondary complications of care recipients. Significantly higher levels of perceived burden were identified in caregivers with lower education, those whose care recipients were affected by tetraplegia and incomplete injuries, and caregivers providing support for a prolonged period. The psychological status of care recipients was not found to contribute to caregiver burden in this study.

The overall level of CB identified in this study is lower than that obtained by Maitan et al5 on a sample consisting principally of caregivers of people with tetraplegia and either total or severe functional dependence. However, the pattern of CBI-SCI scores is comparable, with higher scores attained in the Time-Dependent and Physical dimensions. The inverse correlation between CBI-SCI and MBI in this study is consistent with the findings of Post et al24 identifying functional level as a predictor of CB in a population of people with moderate or minor disabilities.

Demographic and SCI characteristics in this study are comparable to the general SCI population, and the pattern of physical secondary conditions is consistent with those obtained in previous studies,29,38 with chronic pain being more common than UTIs and PrIs. Caregivers reporting the absence of any income22,39 and rehospitalization rates,16,40 although not related to increased CB, were comparable to other studies. Results confirm that the simultaneous occurrence of more than one complication is common in people with SCI,41 with potential risks associated with reduced functionality, QoL, and social participation.10,42,43 

Although the impact of complications on caregivers' well-being has been previously identified,24,25 this study provides more detailed information on the association between specific secondary conditions and separate components of CB. For example, the time-consuming and burdensome vigilance required to prevent and manage PrIs is reflected in the significant time-dependent score.44,45 In the same way, the correlations obtained between UTIs and developmental and emotional burdens confirm that the strict routines involved in appropriate bladder management can result in profound changes in familiar patterns.19 The influence of chronic pain on emotions and sleep disturbances previously identified46 is consistent with increased developmental and emotional burdens in the current sample.

Even though depression and anxiety rates in the sample are consistent with existing literature,47,48 the small sample size may explain the absence of correlation between care recipients' psychological status and perceived burden. Although the influence of SCI care recipients' QoL on caregivers' mental health has been identified,26 findings of this study showed only a weak correlation between CB and PCS. Results confirm that, despite lower than expected QoL scores compared to the general population, people with SCI tend to report good mental QoL.49 

The evaluation and reduction of subjective burden in family caregivers is fundamental to the preservation of health and social functioning of families following life-altering SCIs. The correlation identified between secondary physical conditions and caregiver burden emphasizes the importance of reducing secondary conditions, not just for the benefit of individuals with SCI but also to protect the well-being of family caregivers. However, given the indefinite direction of causality, the possibility that overwhelmed caregivers are less inclined to engage in preventative behaviors must be taken into account and further explored. Empowerment of caregivers may reduce secondary conditions, and health care policies and rehabilitation programs must consider the need for a two-pronged approach addressing both complications and CB. The potential use of online programs for caregivers, similar to those used to improve self-management of UTIs50 and chronic pain51,52 in people with SCI, warrants exploration. The use of technology as applied in the prevention of PrIs53 may be a resource to support families and to enhance communication with health care professionals. Caregivers require education and support, and a combined approach using psycho-education sessions during rehabilitation and peer support groups after discharge is recommended.

Despite its strengths, such as the multicenter design, this study has several limitations. The small number of participants, combined with the use of a cross-sectional design and the means of recruitment, reduces the generalizability of results. A comparative study of CB, including a control group of SCI individuals without secondary complications, is recommended. A longitudinal approach would assist in identifying the variation in CB across the lifespan in response to care recipients' physical and psychological health. Although the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) might be a more sensitive measure of independence,54 the MBI was selected as a short, reliable instrument that participants could complete more easily. This study included a high proportion of people with incomplete injuries, and future studies could benefit from an exclusive focus on specific cohorts of individuals with SCI. A larger sample size would have allowed for a more detailed exploration of additional factors like age, gender, and variability in the relationships of caregivers and recipients.

Caregiver burden in this study was related to the presence of physical secondary conditions in care recipients with SCI. The provision of care over prolonged time periods, injury level, and completeness of injury were associated with a decline in caregiver well-being. The presence of physical secondary conditions is associated with both increased time and emotional demands on caregivers. Innovative, targeted, preventative health interventions that include caregivers and care recipients are recommended to reduce caregiver burden and enhance individual and family well-being following SCI.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

1.
Zarit
SH
,
Todd
PA
,
Zarit
JM.
Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: A longitudinal study
.
The Gerontologist
.
1986
;
26
(
3
):
260
266
.
doi:10.1093/geront/26.3.260
2.
Backx
APM
,
Spooren
AIF
,
Bongers-Janssen
HMH
,
Bouwsema
H.
Quality of life, burden and satisfaction with care in caregivers of patients with a spinal cord injury during and after rehabilitation
.
Spinal Cord
.
2018
;
56
(
9
):
890
899
.
doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0098-7
3.
Middleton
JW
,
Simpson
GK
,
De Wolf
A
,
Quirk
R
,
Descallar
J
,
Cameron
ID.
Psychological distress, quality of life, and burden in caregivers during community reintegration after spinal cord injury
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
2014
;
95
(
7
):
1312
1319
.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.017
4.
Lynch
J
,
Cahalan
R.
The impact of spinal cord injury on the quality of life of primary family caregivers: A literature review
.
Spinal Cord
.
2017
;
55
(
11
):
964
978
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2017.56
5.
Maitan
P
,
Frigerio
S
,
Conti
A
,
Clari
M
,
Vellone
E
,
Alvaro
R.
The effect of the burden of caregiving for people with spinal cord injury (SCI): A cross-sectional study
.
Ann Ist Super Sanita
.
2018
;
54
(
3
):
185
193
.
doi:10.4415/ANN_18_03_04
6.
Charlifue
SB
,
Botticello
A
,
Kolakowsky-Hayner
SA
,
Richards
JS
,
Tulsky
DS.
Family caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury: Exploring the stresses and benefits
.
Spinal Cord
.
2016
;
54
(
9
):
732
736
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2016.25
7.
Dreer
LE
,
Elliott
TR
,
Shewchuk
R
,
Berry
JW
,
Rivera
P.
Family Caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury: Predicting caregivers at risk for probable depression
.
Rehabil Psychol
.
2007
;
52
(
3
):
351
357
.
doi:10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.351
8.
Tarlow
BJ
,
Wisniewski
SR
,
Belle
SH
,
Rubert
M
,
Ory
MG
,
Gallagher-Thompson
D.
Positive aspects of caregiving: Contributions of the REACH project to the development of new measures for Alzheimer's caregiving
.
Res Aging
.
2004
;
26
(
4
):
429
453
.
doi:10.1177/0164027504264493
9.
Dickson
A
,
O'Brien
G
,
Ward
R
,
Flowers
P
,
Allan
D
,
O'Carroll
R.
Adjustment and coping in spousal caregivers following a traumatic spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis
.
J Health Psychol
.
2012
;
17
(
2
):
247
257
.
doi:10.1177/1359105311411115
10.
Post
MWM
,
van Leeuwen
CMC.
Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: A review
.
Spinal Cord
.
2012
;
50
(
5
):
382
389
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2011.182
11.
Skelton
F
,
Hoffman
JM
,
Reyes
M
,
Burns
SP.
Examining health-care utilization in the first year following spinal cord injury
.
J Spinal Cord Med
.
2015
;
38
(
6
):
690
695
.
doi:10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000269
12.
Jörgensen
S
,
Iwarsson
S
,
Lexell
J.
Secondary health conditions, activity limitations, and life satisfaction in older adults with long-term spinal cord injury
.
PM R
.
2017
;
9
(
4
):
356
366
.
doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.004
13.
Stillman
MD
,
Barber
J
,
Burns
S
,
Williams
S
,
Hoffman
JM.
Complications of spinal cord injury over the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
2017
;
98
(
9
):
1800
1805
.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.011
14.
Müller
R
,
Landmann
G
,
Béchir
M
,
et al
.
Chronic pain, depression and quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury: Mediating role of participation
.
J Rehabil Med
.
2017
;
49
(
6
):
489
496
.
doi:10.2340/16501977-2241
15.
Adriaansen
JJE
,
van Asbeck
FWA
,
Lindeman
E
,
van der Woude
LHV
,
de Groot
S
,
Post
MWM.
Secondary health conditions in persons with a spinal cord injury for at least 10 years: Design of a comprehensive long-term cross-sectional study
.
Disabil Rehabil
.
2013
;
35
(
13
):
1104
1110
.
doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.712196
16.
Gabbe
BJ
,
Nunn
A.
Profile and costs of secondary conditions resulting in emergency department presentations and readmission to hospital following traumatic spinal cord injury
.
Injury
.
2016
;
47
(
8
):
1847
1855
.
doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.012
17.
Yamamoto
Y
,
Hayashino
Y
,
Higashi
T
,
et al
.
Keeping vulnerable elderly patients free from pressure ulcer is associated with high caregiver burden in informal caregivers
.
J Eval Clin Pract
.
2010
;
16
(
3
):
585
589
.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01171.x
18.
Dibley
L
,
Coggrave
M
,
McClurg
D
,
Woodward
S
,
Norton
C.
“It's just horrible”: A qualitative study of patients' and carers' experiences of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
.
J Neurol
.
2017
;
264
(
7
):
1354
1361
.
doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8527-7
19.
Fumincelli
L
,
Mazzo
A
,
Martins
JCA
,
Henriques
FMD
,
Cardoso
D
,
Rodrigues
MA.
Quality of life of intermittent urinary catheterization users and their caregivers: A scoping review
.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs
.
2017
;
14
(
4
):
324
333
.
doi:10.1111/wvn.12231
20.
Mergl
R
,
Seidscheck
I
,
Allgaier
A-K
,
Möller
H-J
,
Hegerl
U
,
Henkel
V.
Depressive, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in primary care: Prevalence and recognition
.
Depress Anxiety
.
2007
;
24
(
3
):
185
195
.
doi:10.1002/da.20192
21.
Sakakibara
BM
,
Miller
WC
,
Orenczuk
SG
,
Wolfe
DL.
A systematic review of depression and anxiety measures with individuals with spinal cord injury
.
Spinal Cord
.
2009
;
47
(
12
):
841
851
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2009.93
22.
Chen
Y-C
,
Qi
W-L
,
Kong
K-M.
Effect of electro-acupunture on expression changes of nerve growth factor and receptor in rats with acute spinal cord injury
.
Chin J Clin Rehabil
.
2006
;
10
(
11
):
129
131
.
23.
Chan
RC.
Stress and coping in spouses of persons with spinal cord injuries
.
Clin Rehabil
.
2000
;
14
(
2
):
137
144
.
doi:10.1191/026921500675826560
24.
Post
MWM
,
Bloemen
J
,
de Witte
LP.
Burden of support for partners of persons with spinal cord injuries
.
Spinal Cord
.
2005
;
43
(
5
):
311
319
.
doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101704
25.
Nogueira
PC
,
Rabeh
SAN
,
Caliri
MHL
,
Dantas
RAS
,
Haas
VJ.
Burden of care and its impact on health-related quality of life of caregivers of individuals with spinal cord injury
.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
.
2012
;
20
(
6
):
1048
1056
.
doi:10.1590/S0104-11692012000600006
26.
Coleman
JA
,
Harper
LA
,
Perrin
PB
,
et al
.
Examining the relationship between health-related quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury and the mental health of their caregivers in Colombia, South America
.
Int J Rehabil Res Int Z Rehabil Rev Int Rech Readaptation
.
2013
;
36
(
4
):
308
314
.
doi:10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283634e7f
27.
Collin
C
,
Wade
DT
,
Davies
S
,
Horne
V.
The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study
.
Int Disabil Stud
.
1988
;
10
(
2
):
61
63
.
doi:10.3109/09638288809164103
28.
Kucukdeveci
AA
,
Yavuzer
G
,
Tennant
A
,
Suldur
N
,
Sonel
B
,
Arasil
T.
Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey
.
Scand J Rehabil Med
.
2000
;
32
(
2
):
87
92
.
29.
Kalpakjian
CZ
,
Scelza
WM
,
Forchheimer
MB
,
Toussaint
LL.
Preliminary reliability and validity of a Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale
.
J Spinal Cord Med
.
2007
;
30
(
2
):
131
139
.
30.
Arora
M
,
Harvey
LA
,
Lavrencic
L
,
et al
.
A telephone-based version of the spinal cord injury-secondary conditions scale: A reliability and validity study
.
Spinal Cord
.
2016
;
54
(
5
):
402
405
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2015.119
31.
Ware
JE
,
Kosinki
M
,
Dewey
J
,
Gandek
B.
How to Score and Interpret Single-Item Health Status Measures: A Manual for Users of the of the SF-8 Health Survey
.
Lincoln, RI; Boston, MA
:
QualityMetric, Inc. Health Assessment Lab
;
2001
.
32.
Kroenke
K
,
Spitzer
RL
,
Williams
JB.
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
.
J Gen Intern Med
.
2001
;
16
(
9
):
606
613
.
33.
Krause
JS
,
Saunders
LL
,
Reed
KS
,
Coker
J
,
Zhai
Y
,
Johnson
E.
Comparison of the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Older Adult Health and Mood Questionnaire for self-reported depressive symptoms after spinal cord injury
.
Rehabil Psychol
.
2009
;
54
(
4
):
440
448
.
doi:10.1037/a0017402
34.
Löwe
B
,
Decker
O
,
Müller
S
,
et al
.
Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population
.
Med Care
.
2008
;
46
(
3
):
266
274
.
35.
Ivziku
D
,
Clari
M
,
Piredda
M
,
De Marinis
MG
,
Matarese
M.
Anxiety, depression and quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and caregivers: An actor-partner interdependence model analysis
.
Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil
.
October
2018
.
doi:10.1007/s11136-018-2024-z
36.
Conti
A
,
Clari
M
,
Garrino
L
,
et al
.
Adaptation and validation of the Caregiver Burden Inventory in Spinal Cord Injuries (CBI-SCI)
.
Spinal Cord
.
August
2018
:
1
.
doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0179-7
37.
Altman
D
,
Machin
D
,
Bryant
T
,
Gardner
M.
Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines
.
John Wiley & Sons
;
2013
.
38.
New
PW.
Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage
.
J Spinal Cord Med
.
2016
;
39
(
6
):
665
670
.
doi:10.1080/10790268.2016.1138600
39.
Ebrahimzadeh
MH
,
Shojaei
B-S
,
Golhasani-Keshtan
F
,
Soltani-Moghaddas
SH
,
Fattahi
AS
,
Mazloumi
SM.
Quality of life and the related factors in spouses of veterans with chronic spinal cord injury
.
Health Qual Life Outcomes
.
2013
;
11
:
48
.
doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-48
40.
DeJong
G
,
Tian
W
,
Hsieh
C-H
,
et al
.
Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
2013
;
94
(
4 Suppl
):
S87
97
.
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.037
41.
Brinkhof
MWG
,
Al-Khodairy
A
,
Eriks-Hoogland
I
,
et al
.
Health conditions in people with spinal cord injury: Contemporary evidence from a population-based community survey in Switzerland
.
J Rehabil Med
.
2016
;
48
(
2
):
197
209
.
doi:10.2340/16501977-2039
42.
McColl
MA
,
Arnold
R
,
Charlifue
S
,
Glass
C
,
Savic
G
,
Frankel
H.
Aging, spinal cord injury, and quality of life: Structural relationships
.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
.
2003
;
84
(
8
):
1137
1144
.
43.
Piatt
JA
,
Nagata
S
,
Zahl
M
,
Li
J
,
Rosenbluth
JP.
Problematic secondary health conditions among adults with spinal cord injury and its impact on social participation and daily life
.
J Spinal Cord Med
.
2016
;
39
(
6
):
693
698
.
doi:10.1080/10790268.2015.1123845
44.
Rodrigues
AM
,
Ferreira
PL
,
Ferré-Grau
C.
Providing informal home care for pressure ulcer patients: How it affects carers' quality of life and burden
.
J Clin Nurs
.
2016
;
25
(
19–20
):
3026
3035
.
doi:10.1111/jocn.13356
45.
Willson
M
,
Wilde
M
,
Webb
M-L
,
et al
.
Nursing interventions to reduce the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: part 2: Staff education, monitoring, and care techniques
.
J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs Off Publ Wound Ostomy Cont Nurses Soc
.
2009
;
36
(
2
):
137
154
.
doi:10.1097/01.WON.0000347655.56851.04
46.
Young
J
,
Amatya
B
,
Galea
MP
,
Khan
F.
Chronic pain in multiple sclerosis: A 10-year longitudinal study
.
Scand J Pain
.
2017
;
16
:
198
203
.
doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.070
47.
Jörgensen
S
,
Ginis
KA
,
Iwarsson
S
,
Lexell
J.
Depressive symptoms among older adults with long-term spinal cord injury: Associations with secondary health conditions, sense of coherence, coping strategies and physical activity
.
J Rehabil Med
.
2017
;
49
(
8
):
644
651
.
doi:10.2340/16501977-2259
48.
Tzanos
I-A
,
Mavrogenis
A
,
Gioti
K
,
Papagelopoulos
P
,
Panagiotopoulos
E.
Depressive mood in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in Greece
.
Spinal Cord
.
2018
;
56
(
9
):
883
889
.
doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0093-z
49.
Richard-Denis
A
,
Thompson
C
,
Mac-Thiong
J-M.
Quality of life in the subacute period following a cervical traumatic spinal cord injury based on the initial severity of the injury: A prospective cohort study
.
Spinal Cord
.
2018
;
56
(
11
):
1042
1050
.
doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0178-8
50.
Wilde
MH
,
McMahon
JM
,
Fairbanks
E
,
et al
.
Feasibility of a web-based self-management intervention for intermittent urinary catheter users with spinal cord injury
.
J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs
.
2016
;
43
(
5
):
529
538
.
doi:10.1097/WON.0000000000000256
51.
Dear
BF
,
Nicholson Perry
K
,
Siddall
P
,
et al
.
The Pain Course: Exploring the feasibility of an internet-delivered pain management programme for adults with spinal cord injury
.
Spinal Cord
.
2018
;
56
(
10
):
931
939
.
doi:10.1038/s41393-018-0146-3
52.
Burke
D
,
Lennon
O
,
Blake
C
,
et al
.
An internet delivered cognitive behavioural therapy pain management programme for spinal cord injury pain: A randomised controlled trial
.
Eur J Pain Lond Engl
.
April
2019
.
doi:10.1002/ejp.1402
53.
Pickham
D
,
Berte
N
,
Pihulic
M
,
Valdez
A
,
Mayer
B
,
Desai
M.
Effect of a wearable patient sensor on care delivery for preventing pressure injuries in acutely ill adults: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (LS-HAPI study)
.
Int J Nurs Stud
.
2018
;
80
:
12
19
.
doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.012
54.
Bonavita
J
,
Torre
M
,
China
S
,
et al
.
Validation of the Italian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report
.
Spinal Cord
.
2016
;
54
(
7
):
553
560
.
doi:10.1038/sc.2015.187