Telecommunications technologies spanning a wide range of functionality and cost offer valuable resources for supporting independent living and rehabilitation services. In this article, we review the technology that is used today and explore some potential directions for telerehabilitation. Because telemedicine and telerehabilitation are often closely associated with interactive videoconferencing, we include a discussion of videoconferencing options. However, with the convergence of voice, video, and data in the telecommunications industry, networking benefits go far beyond videoconferencing and point-to-point communications. Although some health care applications may demand greater network performance than can be supported on the Internet today, the federal government's Next Generation Internet Initiative is addressing many of these limitations. This article includes a brief discussion on what the Next Generation Internet can bring to telerehabilitation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 1999
A Review of Current and Future Technology for Telerehabilitation
John Peifer;
John Peifer
1
Senior Research Scientist, Biomedical Interactive Technology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew Hopper
Andrew Hopper
2
Research Engineer, Biomedical Interactive Technology Center, Georgia Institute of Technology
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (1999) 5 (3): 1–10.
Citation
John Peifer, Andrew Hopper; A Review of Current and Future Technology for Telerehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 December 1999; 5 (3): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/VDKH-PQ89-LK2M-7MPE
Download citation file:
45
Views
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team