Current applications of novel robotic engineering to human disease conditions are briefly reviewed in this article. We discuss some examples of assistive technology (e.g., vehicular technology, powered orthoses, and prostheses) and robot-aids or rehabilitators. Robot-aids or rehabilitators are our chosen neologisms to name a new class of robotic devices that represent a substantial departure from prior applications of robotics in rehabilitation. Rather than using robotics as an assistive technology for a disabled individual, we envision robots and computers as supporting and enhancing the productivity of clinicians in their efforts to facilitate a disabled individual's recovery. In this article, we attempt a brief overview of our work including important initial experiments in what promises to be a ground-breaking field. We discuss suggestions for a wider application of modern robotic engineering based on back-driveability to yield objective sensorimotor measurement of sensorimotor behavior and to enhance the therapeutic potential of current neurorehabilitation programs for the disabled.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 1999
Robotic Applications in Neuromotor Rehabilitation
Hermano Krebs;
Hermano Krebs
1
Research Scientist and Lecturer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering Department, Newman Laboratory for Biomechanics and Human Rehabilitation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
Bruce Volpe;
Bruce Volpe
2
Professor, Cornell University Medical College, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, White Plains, New York
Search for other works by this author on:
Mindy Aisen;
Mindy Aisen
3
Director, Veterans Health Administration, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Washington, DC
Search for other works by this author on:
Neville Hogan
Neville Hogan
4
Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering Department and Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Newman Laboratory for Biomechanics and Human Rehabilitation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (1999) 5 (3): 50–63.
Citation
Hermano Krebs, Bruce Volpe, Mindy Aisen, Neville Hogan; Robotic Applications in Neuromotor Rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 December 1999; 5 (3): 50–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/745K-AH73-NCP1-R6CK
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team