Taking into consideration the male predominance in the demographics of spinal cord injury (SCI), it is not surprising that gender differences have been overlooked. Gender differences have been described in numerous physiologic functions, body size and shape, sensory and cognitive functions, and even susceptibility to disease and injury. The focus of this article is to review some physiologic differences observed after SCI in terms of changes in joint biomechanics, specifically the shoulder, and reflex function, particularly as these changes relate to gender differences. The importance of biomechanical and neurophysiologic considerations relevant to SCI and gender are highlighted. The understanding of changes in musculoskeletal and reflex functions promotes a more complete appreciation of the long-term responses to SCI. This is an often overlooked but important perspective on SCI rehabilitation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2001
Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Implications of Gender Differences in Spinal Cord Injury
Michele Schultz;
Michele Schultz
1
Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine
Search for other works by this author on:
Thay Lee;
Thay Lee
2
Associate Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, and is Research Career Scientist, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Patricia Nance
Patricia Nance
3
Associate Professor in Residence and Vice-Chairman, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, and is Chief of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Healthcare Group, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2001) 7 (1): 72–86.
Citation
Michele Schultz, Thay Lee, Patricia Nance; Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Implications of Gender Differences in Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 July 2001; 7 (1): 72–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/U4M3-R004-U5AA-PYVC
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team