The prevalence of pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is reported to be between 65% and 80%; 20% to 30% of this pain is severe. The reported variability in prevalence may be due to a number of methodological factors, which include (a) different definitions of pain after SCI, both with regard to specific pain types and abnormal sensations regarded as pain, (b) variable response rates for surveys and inadequate sampling techniques, (c) variable time from injury until pain assessment, and (d) variability in the classification schemes of pain after SCI. In this article, various classification schemes of pain after SCI are reviewed. It may be hypothesized that widespread use of a comprehensive, but easily used, classification system of pain after SCI will enhance communication between physicians, basic researchers, and clinical researchers and will allow better understanding of this clinical problem through interstudy comparisons of both epidemiological and treatment outcome data. The classification system presented here may have certain advantages over other available systems.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2001
Epidemiology and Classification of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury
Thomas Bryce;
Thomas Bryce
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Search for other works by this author on:
Kristjan Ragnarsson
Kristjan Ragnarsson
2
Dr. Lucy G. Moses Professor and Chairman, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2001) 7 (2): 1–17.
Citation
Thomas Bryce, Kristjan Ragnarsson; Epidemiology and Classification of Pain After Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 October 2001; 7 (2): 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/6A5C-354M-681H-M8T2
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team