Quality of life (QOL) for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) is influenced by issues related to dependence, as well as age and years postinjury. Individuals with complete, high tetraplegia (C1-C4) are greatly dependent on others for all routine activities of daily living. It is hypothesized that better access to equipment, increased independence, and participation will improve QOL. During three study phases, extending up to 24 years postinjury, 58 individuals answered questions about equipment access, participation in leisure/work activities, and QOL. The major influence on participation is age (younger people participate in more activities) not equipment. Access to a modified van was associated in Phases 2 and 3 with better QOL ratings but not with increased participation. Future studies are required to more closely examine the interaction between income, as well as other factors, and the specific ramification(s) that improve QOL for aging individuals with high tetraplegia.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2002
Access to Equipment, Participation, and Quality of Life in Aging Individuals with High Tetraplegia (C1-C4)
Tamara Bushnik
Tamara Bushnik
1
Director of Rehabilitation Research, Rehabilitation Research Center for TBI and SCI, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2002) 7 (3): 17–27.
Citation
Tamara Bushnik; Access to Equipment, Participation, and Quality of Life in Aging Individuals with High Tetraplegia (C1-C4). Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 January 2002; 7 (3): 17–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/3E8Y-NNE5-A473-F763
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team