Growth inhibitory proteins block axon regeneration in the CNS. Many growth inhibitory proteins have been identified, and the Nogo66 receptor (NgR) binds the three major myelin-derived inhibitors. Many studies now indicate that NgR signals to the small GTPase Rho. Our studies have shown that Rho is an important intracellular target for overcoming growth inhibition and promoting axon regeneration after injury. The inactivation of the Rho signaling pathway promotes neurite outgrowth of primary neuronal cell cultures plated on growth inhibitory substrates. To inactivate Rho signaling, C3 transferase, C3-05 (Cethrin; a more potent C3 transferase derivative), and Y-27632, an inhibitor of Rho kinase, have been tested. In vivo, we have documented the regeneration of transected axons after treatment with C3 transferase, C3-05, and Y-27632. C3 transferase and C3-05 have been tested in two animal models: microcrush lesion of the adult rat optic nerve and over-hemisection of adult mouse spinal cord. Treatment with C3-05 gave similar results to C3 transferase, except that the required doses were much lower. Animals treated with C3 transferase, C3-05, or Y-27632 after SCI all showed axon regeneration and impressive functional recovery. Inactivation of Rho to promote regeneration and functional recovery after SCI is simple, and our studies reveal the potential for a new, straightforward technique to promote axon regeneration.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2003
Targeting Rho to Stimulate Repair After Spinal Cord Injury
Lisa McKerracher;
Lisa McKerracher
1
Département de Pathologie et Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal Québec, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew Winton
Matthew Winton
2
Département de Pathologie et Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Montréal, Montréal Québec, Canada.
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2003) 8 (4): 69–75.
Citation
Lisa McKerracher, Matthew Winton; Targeting Rho to Stimulate Repair After Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 April 2003; 8 (4): 69–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/5NA7-MBGU-Q2TU-N41Q
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team