Traumatic cervical spine injuries have traditionally been managed with spinal realignment and immobilization. Halo vest immobilization is the standard nonoperative means of maintaining spinal alignment, however it carries with it significant comorbidity. Cumbersome external orthoses (for either nonoperativeor postoperative stabilization) are associated with delayed mobilization, difficulties in patient transfer, and impairment with active participation in early rehabilitation, which prolongs patient recovery. Advances in surgical strategies, namely the evolution of rigid segmental internal fixation systems, allow for early surgical stabilization of traumatic cervical spine injuries with less reliance on extended halo vest wear, which shortens immobilization times and facilitates early rehabilitation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
January 01 2003
Advances in Operative Stabilization for Unstable Cervical Spine Injuries: Implications for Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation
Scott Daffner;
Scott Daffner
1
Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Search for other works by this author on:
Alexander Vaccaro;
Alexander Vaccaro
2
Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital and the Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Search for other works by this author on:
Mara Katsos;
Mara Katsos
3
Medical student, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jonathan Grauer
Jonathan Grauer
4
Spine Fellow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Search for other works by this author on:
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil (2003) 9 (1): 1–13.
Citation
Scott Daffner, Alexander Vaccaro, Mara Katsos, Jonathan Grauer; Advances in Operative Stabilization for Unstable Cervical Spine Injuries: Implications for Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1 July 2003; 9 (1): 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1310/2LLK-EC9V-UY4A-KJLC
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Behavioral/Physical and Stimulation Interventions for Chronic Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Linda Ehrlich-Jones, PhD, RN, Elise Olsen, BA, Angelika Kudla, MS, Jennifer Burns, BA, Nicole Sharf, MA, Q. Eileen Wafford, MST, MLIS, Allen W. Heinemann, PhD
Grocery Shopping and Eating Behaviors Differ Between Persons With and Without a Spinal Cord Injury
Zachary J. Donato, MS, MD, Adam S. Levy, MS, MD, Alicia Sneij, PhD, MS, RD, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA, Arthur S. Berg, PhD, Lauren T. Shapiro, MD, MPH, Gary J. Farkas, PhD, MSCTI
No Beneficial Effects of the Alfasigma VSL#3 Probiotic Treatment After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Pamela J.F. Raposo, MSc, Antoinette T. Nguyen, PhD, Emma K.A. Schmidt, PhD, Abel Torres Espin, PhD, Keith K. Fenrich, PhD, David J. Bennett, PhD, Karim Fouad, PhD
Perspectives on Barriers to Use and Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation From Australians and New Zealanders With SCI and Clinicians and Researchers in the Field
Anne E. Palermo, PT, DPT, PhD, Edward Gorgon, PT, PhD, Antonio Vecchio, BS, Lisa Tedesco Triccas, PT, PhD, Euan McCaughey, PhD, Maggie Donovan-Hall, PhD
Breastfeeding After Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Associated Complications
Andrei Krassioukov, MD, PhD, Amanda H.X. Lee, MSc, MD (student), Stacy Elliott, MD, Teri Thorson, Nathan Agon-Chen, BKin, MPT, MD, Gavin Naicker, BSc, MBT, MD (student), Matthew Querée, MAppPsych, Janice Eng, PhD, BSc(PT/OT), SCIRE Team