Skip to Main Content
Table 4

Nutritional content of species after implementation of understory fertilization (fert), prescribed burning (burn), and prescribed burning with understory fertilization (burn/fert) in two closed-canopy hardwood stands (Rocky River Hunting Club [RR] and Ames Plantation [AP]) in Tennessee, July–August 2005. Dashes indicate composite sample of species collected in a given treatment was not large enough for nutritional analysis. Rose also not included at AP because sample was not large enough for nutritional analysis.

Nutritional content of species after implementation of understory fertilization (fert), prescribed burning (burn), and prescribed burning with understory fertilization (burn/fert) in two closed-canopy hardwood stands (Rocky River Hunting Club [RR] and Ames Plantation [AP]) in Tennessee, July–August 2005. Dashes indicate composite sample of species collected in a given treatment was not large enough for nutritional analysis. Rose also not included at AP because sample was not large enough for nutritional analysis.
Nutritional content of species after implementation of understory fertilization (fert), prescribed burning (burn), and prescribed burning with understory fertilization (burn/fert) in two closed-canopy hardwood stands (Rocky River Hunting Club [RR] and Ames Plantation [AP]) in Tennessee, July–August 2005. Dashes indicate composite sample of species collected in a given treatment was not large enough for nutritional analysis. Rose also not included at AP because sample was not large enough for nutritional analysis.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal