Figures 2–5. Figure 2. Exposure of the grafted site shows ridge quality consistent with natural bone appearance. No graft particles are noted within the extraction site, and the site has a “bone hard” feel. Figure 3. Core specimen, which appeared like a bone core, was submitted for light microscopy. Figure 4. Large 6-mm wide diameter taper screw vent implant was placed in the area of tooth #30, whereas only a 3.5-mm wide diameter could be placed in the previously edentulous area of tooth #31. Figure 5. Postoperative periapical radiograph demonstrates maximum surface area implant in the Puros-grafted site

Figures 2–5. Figure 2. Exposure of the grafted site shows ridge quality consistent with natural bone appearance. No graft particles are noted within the extraction site, and the site has a “bone hard” feel. Figure 3. Core specimen, which appeared like a bone core, was submitted for light microscopy. Figure 4. Large 6-mm wide diameter taper screw vent implant was placed in the area of tooth #30, whereas only a 3.5-mm wide diameter could be placed in the previously edentulous area of tooth #31. Figure 5. Postoperative periapical radiograph demonstrates maximum surface area implant in the Puros-grafted site

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal