Figures 8–11. Figure 8. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by granules at 6 and 12 weeks. No significant statistical differences among groups or experimental times could be found. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 9. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by bone tissue at 6 and 12 weeks. Significant statistical differences were found, as shown: (1) SHA(s) values for 12 weeks differed significantly from other biomaterial groups and control. (2) BHA(s) values for 12 weeks differed significantly from SHA(l). (3) BHA(s) values differed between 6 and 12 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 10. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by bone marrow at 6 and 12 weeks. Significant statistical differences were found, as shown: (1) When the marrow area at 6 weeks was compared among biomaterial groups, the BHA(l) values were significantly smaller than the others. (2 and 3) Control values at 6 and 12 weeks differed significantly from biomaterial groups. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 11. X-ray diffraction (XRD) of BHA (left side) and SHA (right side) granules. The sharpness of the XRD peaks demonstrates the similarities in crystallinity of these biomaterials.

Figures 8–11. Figure 8. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by granules at 6 and 12 weeks. No significant statistical differences among groups or experimental times could be found. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 9. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by bone tissue at 6 and 12 weeks. Significant statistical differences were found, as shown: (1) SHA(s) values for 12 weeks differed significantly from other biomaterial groups and control. (2) BHA(s) values for 12 weeks differed significantly from SHA(l). (3) BHA(s) values differed between 6 and 12 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 10. Bar chart showing the percentage of area in the defect occupied by bone marrow at 6 and 12 weeks. Significant statistical differences were found, as shown: (1) When the marrow area at 6 weeks was compared among biomaterial groups, the BHA(l) values were significantly smaller than the others. (2 and 3) Control values at 6 and 12 weeks differed significantly from biomaterial groups. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Figure 11. X-ray diffraction (XRD) of BHA (left side) and SHA (right side) granules. The sharpness of the XRD peaks demonstrates the similarities in crystallinity of these biomaterials.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal